Project: Amtrak as Subway Map (revised)

comments 20
Filed Under:
My Transit Maps, Prints Available

One of my longest-running projects is a subway diagram-styled map of Amtrak’s passenger rail network, with the original version dating back to 2010. I always made sure to update it regularly over the years, adding and deleting stations to keep it current. In April last year, I attempted to update the design of the map as well, although I ended up trying a few too many overly-clever things with it – overlaying lines on top of each other just because I was in love with transparency effects being the worst offender. The final result ended up being less than satisfactory, and I shelved the project while I worked on other things.

Coming back with fresh eyes almost a year-and-a-half later, I was able to be ruthlessly objective about what worked and what didn’t in that 2015 draft. The confusing overlaid route lines definitely had to go, but the new typography – using the superb Fira Sans – and larger route designation bullets were huge improvements over the original design. From this starting point, I set out with some clear goals for improvement this time around.

First and foremost was more intelligent, harmonious spacing of stations. Previous versions crammed some sections in very tightly, while giving far too much space to other parts of the map. The chief offenders for closely-packed stations have always been the Keystone/Pennsylvanian routes running west out of Philadelphia, all the Michigan Service routes,  and the Missouri River Runner between St. Louis and Kansas City – so I paid extra attention to these sections, ensuring that the minimum distance between stops on these sections was the same as that defined elsewhere on the map. For the record, the gap between stations on the Northeast Corridor was used as the “building block” for the rest of the map, and it’s been much more faithfully adhered to in this version of the map.

More intelligent spacing also helped a lot on the west coast. Previously, I’d spaced these stations relatively evenly from Vancouver, BC all the way down to San Diego. This looks nice enough in isolation, but it caused the split route lines in the Empire Builder at Spokane to take up way too much space – the three stations on each of these two branches were placed much further apart than any other stations on the entire map. Eastern Washington state is big, but not that big!

In this version, I broke the west coast into a “Pacific Northwest” section from Vancouver down to Eugene-Springfield, and a “California” section from Sacramento all the way down to San Diego. These two sections were spaced as tightly as their Northeast Corridor counterpart on the east coast, with the connecting rural Oregon/California section on the Coast Starlight being more loosely spaced to fill in the resulting gap between the two regions. This improved the spacing and visual size of the Empire Builder branches immensely, possibly the single biggest improvement on the map. I’d always used a similar approach on the City of New Orleans route right from the first version of the map, so doing this actually made the design of the map more consistent.

I also reworked the trajectory of the Southwest Chief on this version. It’s a little twistier than before, but it puts the Colorado stations in a better location relative to Denver, which I think is a spatial improvement.

Keen-eyed readers will have noticed that there’s a new Amtrak service shown on the map – the Winter Park Ski Train that will start running between Denver and the Winter Park ski resort this January! It only has one return trip each Saturday and Sunday (and on the Presidents Day and MLK Day holidays) through to the end of March, but it’s definitely exciting to add a new line to the map, no matter how short it is! The new purpose-built station at Winter Park will not be served by the daily California Zephyr, which will continue to stop just down the line at Fraser instead.

This version of the map also shows two future Amtrak stations – Hillsborough, North Carolina (opening 2020), and Arcadia Valley, Missouri (potentially opening as early as Fall this year) – as well as the “suspended” section of the Sunset Limited between New Orleans and Orlando. I put this last bit in to show that the map is intentionally designed to accommodate it, just in case – by some miracle – it ever gets reinstated. The potential extension of Northeast Regional service to Roanoke is a little further into the future, so it remains off the map for now (although it would be quite easy to add when the time comes).

As usual, your thought and comments are welcome! Prints are now on sale in my online shop from just $27: there’s a version that includes the suspended Sunset Limited track, and another that just shows the current services.

Visualization: The Commutometer

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Visualizations

By now, everyone should know that I love a good isochrone map, so I’ve definitely been having fun with the Commutometer. It’s an online map that uses data from nine transit agencies around the San Francisco Bay Area to show you how far you can get from your currently selected point by public transport in a certain amount of time. It defaults to 30 minutes, but you can set it from anywhere from 5 minutes to two hours. The nifty four-band isochrone setting seen above can be enabled from the “configure” menu. There’s lots of fun to be had, although some locals seem to have queried its accuracy.

Bonus tip that the app doesn’t tell you: you can use the search tool up to the top left to move the map to Paris or (even less obviously) Rennes in France and generate isochrones for those cities as well. Note that half an hour’s travel from the centre of Paris gets you pretty much anywhere within the city proper!

Source: commutometer.com

Submission – Idealised Edinburgh Tramways Map, c.1940s by Andy Arthur

comment 1
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Submitted by Andy, who says:

Hi, I recently got a bit over-fascinated and nostalgic about the old tramways network of Edinburgh and decided it would be fun to plot out a schematic routemap of the old system as it never quite was at some point in the late 1940s. I also had a little bit of fun trying to make it look like it just might have come out of the Corporation Tramways Department, even though they were never keen on branding much beyond the corporate colours of madder and white, the city crest and later on a rather crude “ECT” logotype (which to the best of my knowledge actually applied to Edinburgh City Transport, as it was renamed after the tram network was run down). They never actually issued a schematic map, they were quite topographically faithful. I’ve based the style loosely on Beck’s earlier designs. It’s mainly 90 degrees, but with a 30 degree added for parts of Leith which is geographically fairly correct. I feel this helps identify Leith as an area in its own right, and makes the thing a little bit more interesting, and was a fun challenge to draw. It also meant I could get away with a few non-right angles in other parts of the map to make things fit.

Given my real drive to produce this was to highlight just how much public transport has been lost in Edinburgh, I added the 1950s British Railways suburban network in too. It also meant I wasn’t hugely concerned about how difficult or otherwise it would be to actually use the map to get around if you could travel back in time to 1951!

I borrowed the idea of the daisy rings of route numbers along the way from genuine old ECT maps, and also faithfully maintained the complex system of denoting the service termini but making the reader work the actual route out for themselves by tracing along the lines looking for the correct numbers. There were a number of circular/figure-of-8 routes that had no real terminus as such, so I have indicated the main noted destinations. I’ve also included the colour lighting system that was used to help passengers identify the correct tram at night and in the notorious “Auld Reekie” smog of Edinburgh.

There are a number of geographic compromises taken to fit it to the page i.e. the right-hand line heading down the page in reality was a fairly straight E-W line along the coast.

Last, but not least, I have invented the stops for myself by placing the logical main streets neighbourhoods and landmarks along each route.


Transit Maps says:

Andy, I love this! 

It might depict a “perfect” system that – as you say – never quite existed, but it works wonderfully well as an evocative period piece. Everything – the sombre colours, the typography, the lovely rings of route numbers, the ECT monogram and even the nicely understated “old paper” texture – combine to make this quite a lovely bit of work.

There’s lots of detail to pore over as well, especially that ridiculously dense British Rail network. I particularly like the detailed explanation of the colour lighting system, which is a fascinating little solution to a problem. It initially seems quite complicated, but I guess you really only had to remember your route’s set of lights, not all of them!

If you’re not already, you should definitely try and sell prints of this map, because I think they’d be quite popular!

Cancelled Official Map – Public Transport Network Map of Sydney, Australia, 2016

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

I’ve often lamented that Sydney’s transit maps each seem to live in a “mode vacuum”, where each individual map steadfastly refuses to acknowledge any other mode of transit, even though they’re all operated by the same agency. So the light rail map won’t show any connections to the main Sydney Train network, and the ferry map ignores the major train station located directly behind Circular Quay… that kind of stuff.

Unfortunately, this new attempt at an integrated transit map fails so completely at presenting a coherent overview of the complete network that I really wish that they hadn’t even bothered. First off, this map seems to have more in common with the previous CityRail map than the current Sydney Trains map, which doesn’t present a very consistent branding effort. 

All the main line trains are now presented in uniform “T”-branded orange, so it’s basically impossible to work out any service patterns. However, the map resolutely clings to depicting each service as a separate line, which is just ridiculous in the context of this map. Simplifying the train services down to a single-weight route line labelling all the stations would have made more sense, and would have opened up the map, allowing the other modes to get equal visual weight – the ferry and light rail services have to be jammed into some very tight spaces!

Question: why do certain railway stations get called out like major interchanges when they’re not visibly interchanging with anything? This is especially noticeable along the Southern Highlands line, where Picton, Mittagong, Bowral and more all get a peculiar “double tick” treatment with a bold label. Of course, the answer is that these stations have interchanges with country bus services, but those aren’t shown on this map at all, so the ticks no longer have any meaning.

Last time I looked, Kiama was located on the coast, not several kilometres inland. 

The depiction of light rail and ferry services are probably the least worst part of this mess, although you’d never know that the Lewisham West light rail stop is less than a 500-metre walk from Lewisham station from this map.

If those two services are shown tolerably, the depiction of bus services definitely is not. All of greater Sydney just gets covered in a light orange zone that means “buses go here.” It’s so ridiculously desultory that I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. And the label for Southern Sydney gets placed outside the shaded area, so… are there no buses there?

Finally, there’s the enormous and bizarre directional labels: “West to Dubbo” and “North to Byron Bay”. Neither of these locations have the slightest thing to do with Sydney’s transportation network and don’t even really make sense from a statewide transportation perspective. And poor old south doesn’t get a label at all.

Our rating: Very little of this makes any sense whatsoever. Poorly thought out, lazily executed and pretty much useless. Would have been much improved by showing major bus corridors and highlighting important interchange locations. The blanket “We have buses in Sydney!” shading is just embarrassing. Half a star, and that’s only because I think the little illustrative icons at the top left are kind of neat.

Source: Transport NSW “Exploring Sydney” web page – but deleted almost immediately after being posted

Official Map – Cincinnati Bell Connector Streetcar Map, 2016

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Hey, the Cincinnati Streetcar – sorry, the corporate branded “Cincinnati Bell Connector” – opened today! It’ll run for free over the weekend, with fares to be paid from Monday onwards. This is notable because it really looked like this streetcar would never get off the ground, what with anti-streetcar ballot initiatives, opposition from Ohio’s Governor John Kasich, and a mayor in John Cranley who threatened to cancel the project and literally tear up a section of already-constructed tracks.

But it’s finally here, and this is the system map. It’s so… grey.

I understand that a muted background colour scheme can be desirable to enable the route to stand out, but this just ends up being oppressive and grim. It also calls undue attention to the tangled web of Interstate highways that hem the city in.

Unusually, stop names are numbered on the map and then referenced in a legend. I always find this a little unfriendly, as you have to look back and forth between the two to work out how the names and locations are related.

Points of interest are represented by an uneasy mix of simplified black architectural elevations (popular on many a wayfinding map these days), logos for the Library, Arts Center and CAC, with labelled darker grey footprints for larger buildings. It’s all a little hodge-podge, and some more thought here could have created a really nice unifying element for the map.

Our rating: Not horrendous, but not fantastic either. The legend for stop names is annoying. Two-and-a-half stars. Compare to the super clean, minimalist look adopted by the Kansas City Streetcar.

Source: City of Cincinnati website

Submission – Unofficial reworking of the UTA FrontRunner Strip Map by Jeromiah Drennan (and me)

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
My Transit Maps, Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Jeromiah, who says:

After the post about the new Frontrunner map (August 2016, 2.5 stars), inspiration came to make one of my own.

My map has what was mentioned: TRAX connections, bus connections, and Greyhound (but not Amtrak, If you look at Salt Lake Central on my map you’ll see why) I took out the the lines and changed the north and south pointers. I made the purple line dashed between Ogden and Pleasant View to show the limited serviceThe labels for TRAX and Greyhound are based off of what the London Underground uses on their maps for transfers. I also thought It would be important to take out the legend completely, so I designed the map so it wouldn’t need it. Fonts used are Whitney Medium and Whitney Book.

I’m hoping to send this to UTA soon, but I thought I’d post it here first.

What are your thoughts? Do the bus route numbers make the map cluttered? What improvements do I need to make?

Transit Maps says:

Nice work, Jeromiah! I think your solution is well thought out and nicely executed overall. Your station name labels are perhaps a little too close to their respective dots for my liking, and I have a feeling that you’ve given yourself too much extra vertical space compared to the original map, which is a little cheaty. However, the original photo shows the map on a very curved surface, so it’s a little hard to tell for sure. I think your north and south indicators are better than the original: the grey visually separates them from the route line, and the arrows work well to define them as compass directions. 

I’m not so sure about the dashed line indicating the limited service to Pleasant View – without a legend, it could be misinterpreted as meaning “under construction”. Destination signs and announcements should let riders know where the last stop is: a map like this is for locating where you are and counting the number of stops until you get off, not explaining the minutiae of the operating schedule.

You’re on the right track with the connecting services information: located below the route line to separate it from the station name, and ordered logically. The bus numbers are perhaps a little small, and still run into each other a little bit – so they can still look like a long string of random numbers rather than distinct bus numbers.

Underneath your map is one that I independently developed almost immediately after my original post and shared on Twitter. You can see that it has a lot of similarities to yours, but I’ve explicitly placed each bus number inside a box, which is then arranged in a grid to help visually separate all those numbers from each other. Also, all my type is horizontal, because it takes up less vertical space (more room for the bus numbers!) and it reads more easily. I really should add the UTA contact information as Jeromiah has done, though – a useful touch, though perhaps the Facebook/Twitter/Instagram icons are less useful without their associated handles.

Official Map: Beta Version of the Los Angeles Metro Website/Trip Planner

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

The Los Angeles Metro opened up a new beta version of its website for public review today. The first noticeable thing is that the interactive system map is front and centre on the home page – the very first thing that you see upon entering the site. No having to click through to the deepest depths of the website just to find a map here, something too many agencies still insist on doing.

It’s still a little rough around the edges at the moment – I can’t get it to accept a starting or end point in the trip planner! – but this definitely looks very promising. At the moment, the map only shows Metro data, but they hope to add data for 24 other LA-area transit agencies by the end of the year when the new version of the site goes properly live. Now there’s something to look forward to – a unified trip planner that integrates the myriad transit options available to travellers in this sprawling metropolis, regardless of who is supplying the service.

More details about the website redesign can be found on Metro’s “The Source” blog.

Official Maps: Sound Transit Link Federal Way Extension Alternatives

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Here’s some interesting isometric-style maps that crossed my desk the other day. They’re part of a series of maps from the Sound Transit Federal Way Link Extension Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Summary that outline all the proposed potential alignments from the soon-to-be-completed Angle Lake station south to Federal Way. 

I believe that the maps were produced by HDR as a consultant to Sound Transit, and they do quite a nice job of comparing and contrasting the different alignments in a simplified, visually interesting form. Each map shows the main route in its own distinctive colour, with “optional extras” shown in yellow. Elevated and below-grade track is easily shown because of the isometric format – an advantage over conventional “top down” maps, which have to resort to modifying the stroke of the route line and then explaining those changes with a legend. Remember: show, don’t tell!

Of course, I-5 and SR 99 don’t really run as neatly parallel as this map would suggest (they’re really quite close near the proposed Highline College stop), but for quickly comparing all the alternatives and reaching a diverse public audience – there are four maps like this in the DEIS summary – I think this format does an excellent job.

For the record, the I-5 Alternative with the Highline College station option – as seen in the second map above – became the Preferred Alternative for this project back in January 2016.

Source: Sound Transit project website

Data Visualization: “London Heartbeat” by Oliver O’Brien

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Visualizations

I’m loving this interactive map by Oliver O’Brien that uses entry and exit data direct from TfL to build a picture of how the Tube across the course of a typical day – with around 5 million rides or so. (The data doesn’t yet include the newly-introduced Night Tube, so things wrap up as the last “day” trains finish their journeys at the moment.) 

Watching the day progress is mesmerising enough – especially the flow during the two major peak periods – but you can also drill down to see detailed information for individual stations, which is kind of amazing. Interestingly, while the map uses a heartbeat as a metaphor for the flow, I almost see it as breathing: inhaling (inbound) for the morning peak, and exhaling (outbound) in the evening. Either metaphor works to describe how vital the Tube is in making London a living city. This is really lovely work by Oliver, and definitely worthy of detailed perusal! 

Go explore by clicking here.

Submission – Official Map: UTA FrontRunner Commuter Rail, Salt Lake City, 2016

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Mike Christensen, who says:

The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) recently added strip maps to its FrontRunner commuter rail trains. At first glance, the maps looked adequate to me. But after a few moments of thought, I have the following critique. First off, the N and S denoting north and south at the end of the route is a bit confusing. However, the biggest criticism I have is the lost opportunity to show connecting bus routes at FrontRunner stations.

UTA has been trying to find ways to encourage riders to make greater use of its bus system, and I feel that UTA really missed out on an opportunity to do so using the strip map. The strip map does show the three stations featuring transfers to UTA’s three TRAX light rail lines, but the map completely fails to specify which TRAX lines can be transferred to. Additionally, the strip map could have also highlighted non-UTA connections, such as Amtrak at Salt Lake Central and Provo and Greyhound at Salt Lake Central and Ogden, and should have highlighted the connection to the Salt Lake City International Airport via the TRAX Green Line at North Temple.

I took a few moments to mock up the map with my suggestions (second image above – Cam). Hopefully, UTA will give more thought to the maps they produce in the future.


Transit Maps says:

Mike’s summary is pretty astute – the official map does the bare minimum to be functional, but misses out on opportunities to be more useful. Visually, it’s simple enough, though I’ll never understand why the UTA feels it necessary to add leader lines between station symbols and their associated labels. On a simple strip map like this, there’s very little chance of mixing stations up.

The legend is a bit odd: it gives the full official name of the FrontRunner line (line 750), when it’s already completely obvious that this is what the map shows – the giant “FrontRunner” logotype is a dead giveaway, don’t you think? The legend also indicates that the “T” indicates a transfer to TRAX, without explaining what that is. You can’t just assume that everyone riding knows that “TRAX” equals “light rail”! And Mike is definitely right in saying that the colours of each connecting light rail line should be denoted, as well as other alternate modes of transport. I especially like his suggestion to add Amtrak and Greyhound connections, and an indication of the airport connection should be vital.

Mike’s own map is very obviously a quick and dirty mockup, but it does show how more useful information could be added to the map. It also shows how tricky it can be to add a lot of bus route numbers to a map like this: they can end up just looking like a long string of random numbers pretty quickly. I’d probably suggest that connection information be moved below the route line and be set horizontally, as reading that amount of small text with your head at an angle while riding a train is going to be hard work! The north and south arrows are a good idea, but I think that Mike’s implementation of them could be interpreted as further extensions of the line off the edge of the map. A good old-fashioned north pointer could actually do the job a little better here.

Our rating: The official map is about as average as you can get. Does the job and very little more. Two-and-a-half stars. Mike’s mockup is imperfect, but definitely food for thought on how the official map could be improved.