New “Highways of the USA” Map – Hawaii

comments 3
Filed Under:
My Transit Maps

Disclaimer: this was produced for April Fools Day and is not an actual product in the “Highways of the USA” print series.

Pretty much as soon as I finished my monumental Highways of the United States project last year, people started asking me why I hadn’t included the two non-contiguous states of Alaska and Hawaii, both of which do actually contain federal highways in one form or another.

To be honest, after finishing the giant map of the lower 48 states and then splitting that up into all the maps of the different states and regions, I was pretty much exhausted and needed a break from the project. After two years of intensive research and design, can you blame me? Fast-forward to almost a year later, and I finally feel that I can revisit those requests for the two “missing” states. After a lot of thought, I’ve decided against doing Alaska, as my maps only show existing signed routes. While the Alaskan “A” Interstates exist on paper and in funding budgets, there’s not a single Interstate shield to be found along the highways of that state. Also, Alaska is freaking huge, and there’s no way I’m drawing/simplifying all that crinkly coastline!

Hawaii is a different matter, however, as its “H” Interstates – all on the island of O’ahu – are very definitely signed. There are three “major” highways: H-1 through H-3, and one three-digit loop highway, H-201. The major highways don’t follow the same odd/even numbering conventions of mainland Interstates, but are just numbered in the order that they were funded and constructed. Together, the four highways total just 55.4 miles (89 kilometres) in length, but feature some impressive (and expensive) engineering, especially along Interstate H-3.

And for all you people asking how the heck Hawaii can have Interstate highways when they clearly don’t travel interstate, hush. In this instance, “Interstate” refers to the method of federal funding and the minimum standards that the highway must adhere to. There are plenty of intrastate Interstate highways on the mainland: I-97 in Maryland is actually wholly contained within one county. More information on Hawaii’s Interstates here on the FHWA’s website.

The map uses the same design conventions and is drawn at the same scale as my other Highways of the United States maps, although I’ve introduced some appropriately tropical colours for each of the highways. To give a proper sense of scale, I’ve included the entire Hawaiian archipelago.

Submission – A Heart-shaped Map for Helsinki’s New Airport Rail Loop

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Augustin, who says:

A new ring rail line is soon to be opened in Helsinki, thus providing a convenient way to reach the airport from city centre (only bus services are available as of now). HSL, the local transportation authority, advertises this huge change with a lovely heart shaped map of the ring, conveniently showing all the stops the trains will potentially call at, although the actual stopping pattern on the line has yet to be decided. (If there are too much stops to the airport, the train will not do better than bus, which takes 30 minutes and leaves every 10 minute from Helsinki train station bus centre. My guess is that there will be omnibus services on both ways, and expresses services to the airport using the shorter I way.)

The geographically accurate map shows that, indeed, the completed ring will be pretty much heart shaped. The stylized version does a good enough job for advertising purposes, even showing the transfers to other transportation means, and the transversal high frequency buses (orange lines, known as “Jokerit”). We’ll see how it’s included in the global maps. The letters P and I by which the two services are to be known (viz. clockwise and counterclockwise) refer, I guess, to Pohjoinen (Nothern, as the section from Helsinki to Vantaankoski is on the main railway that serves central and northern Finland), and Itäinen (Eastern, because of the section between Helsinki and Tikkurila.)

Opening is due in early July, but Helsinkians already surely love it! (The completion of that project has been long awaited…)


Transit Maps says:

The map is actually quite adorable, and works really nicely within the context of introducing the new rail service to the public. I note that HSL’s home page uses a heart-shaped icon to represent the new service, so this is definitely part of an overall branding effort.

As for how the new line will fit into upcoming maps, I’ve got some more submissions in the pipeline that give us some idea of that. Stay tuned!

Source: project page on HSL’s website

Rail Services of the Bay Area, September 1937 by David Edmondson

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

David, who runs The Greater Marin blog, has created this absolutely superb modern transit diagram version of rail services in the Bay Area in 1937. He’s used a contemporaneous railway timetable as his main source of information, so it seem to be pretty accurate, although he’s still seeking final feedback about the map’s content before finishing the project up.

Stylistically, the map quite obviously borrows from Massimo Vignelli’s New York subway map, complete with black station dots. The addition of hollow “sometimes stops” dots somewhat dilutes Vignelli’s “no dot, no stop” mantra, but helpfully adds another layer of information. The use of the superbly legible Fira Sans typeface also helps to give the map a slightly friendlier, less minimalist look. 

While the modern iteration of Vignelli’s subway map groups and colour-codes route lines by their common trunk line, this map color-codes them instead by the operating railroad company. This works wonderfully well and instantly shows how the routes were divided up geographically between all the competing companies. It’s interesting to note that the map appears to indicate that many trains terminate in San Francisco at Market Street (Image 2 above), which isn’t quite true. While the Bay Bridge had opened in 1936, rail service across its lower deck to the Transbay Terminal didn’t start until 1939. At this time, ferries – often scheduled to coincide with the arrival and departure of trains – crossed from the Ferry Building to gigantic railway wharves on the eastern side of the Bay. David mentions the ferry services in the legend to the map, but some visual indication that the journey requires a change of transportation mode at the wharves could be nice. Perhaps just a white square behind the black dots to indicate the “break” would work?

The use of thin lines to indicate services that only had one train a day works nicely, but it can lead to a bit of visual clutter when other route lines pass underneath the thinner lines. Look at the third image above and observe how the teal Atcheson, Topeka & Santa Fe (ATSF) route line passes underneath all of the other route lines it comes across. Where it meets a combination of thick and thin lines, there’s a little gap left between them that the ATSF line peeks through. Depending on the combination of thick and thin route lines, these gaps can appear in varying widths, so the overall effect can be a little messy.

In situations like this, I prefer to place the single route above the wider, multiple-track routes. I think it looks cleaner, and it also makes that single track easier to follow along its entire path. David’s actually already done this in a couple of places, and the difference is obvious to me – see the last image above, where the red D6 route drops south-east out of Tracy above the purple and yellow lines that it crosses. Much better!

Very minor things: I personally think the route designation discs could be a bit larger in relation to the label type to make them easier to read from a distance, and it also looks like some of the black station dots are not quite centred on their route line (see the main San Francisco – Market Street station, where they’re all slightly too far above and to the right of the routes). I’m also not crazy about the way some text in the legend encroaches into the gutter between the columns, but I can see that there’s limited space there for a lot of information!

Our rating: Painstakingly researched and beautifully realised: this is my kind of transit map! Four stars. David hopes to have prints of this map available by April 15 on his blog, so keep an eye out if you’d like a copy!

Source: via David’s Twitter (link to PDF)

Photo: Layer Upon Layer of Tube Map, 2008

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Great photo of a old and weather-worn Tube Map, taken at White City tube station. If you look closely, you can see that more than one layer of map is visible in certain sections, giving sort of an archaeological cross-section of different eras (See the doubled-up interchange station symbols at Euston for a good example). The most visible map seems to date from the early 1970s as it shows the Highbury branch of the Northern Line towards the upper right of the photo, soon to be transferred to British Rail.

Source: jayay/Flickr

Photo: “London Shopping Guide” Book Cover, 1977

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Mash-Up Maps

Riffing off the Tube Map is not entirely a modern phenomenon, as this Penguin book cover from 1977 shows. (Re)design by John Carrod.

Source: coversetc/Flickr

Photo: New York Subway Map/New York Subway Jacket

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Miscellany

I am so happy that this serendipitous photograph exists.

Source: Mark Verbos/Flickr

ReMap: Real-Time NY Subway Map Information

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps, Visualizations

A short intro video for ReMap: a dynamic, interactive map with the ability to distribute and express real-time New York Subway information, which looks very promising indeed. Manhattan only at the moment, it seems (gotta appeal to the tourists!) but the mapping style is very nice (a bit of Vignelli, a bit of KickMap). I particularly like that the length of transfer walks is indicated proportionately on the map. The use of Bluetooth to push updates to users who are in the subway network and out of WiFi/cell network range seems almost incredible… although they’re still working on that.

More info here.

Submission – Historical Map: Trams and Buses of Brussels, Belgium, 1958

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Submitted by Thierry.

A very stylish diagrammatic map of tramways (coloured lines) and bus routes (dotted black lines). This city’s historic centre is shaded grey, while the site of Expo 58 (or the Brussels World’s Fair) is given much prominence to the top left of the map. There’s a lovely economy of line in this map: everything serves a purpose and there’s a definite minimalist clarity in the design. Quite lovely.

Submission – Unofficial Future Rail Map of Stockholm by Bernie Ng

comment 1
Filed Under:
Future Maps, Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Bernie, whose Melbourne and Singapore maps have been featured previously on Transit Maps. Of this map, Bernie says:

Attached is a map of the Stockholm railway network (including the metro system, trams, local railways and commuter railways operated by SL, and Arlanda Express). I got a bit of inspiration after a recent visit. I loved the original Stockholm subway map – it is an exercise of minimalist beauty. Just three colours, and dashed lines for stops. All the terminii are lined up together. Loved it!  

However, they have since tried to add other railways to the map, and to be honest, I think it messes up that simplicity. If the future extensions are thrown in, they are going to have to redraw the whole thing as it is getting horribly cramped!  (e.g. how will they account for L22 being extended from Sickla udde to meet L25 at Sickla?) 

So as I was on holidays, I thought about a reimagined version of the map.  I started with a focal point. I thought the ring tram line (Tvarbanan – L22) would be a nice visual hook if I can put the downtown in the exact centre of the circle (that would be where Stockholm C/T-Centralen) is. I gave colours to more of the lines to make the map less dour in character, and to give more equal footing to the other forms of railways. Stockholm is a city surrounded by water and islands, so I thought that rather with dispensing geography altogether, putting some of it gives the map more character, and map help with navigation as well.  This map includes future extensions under consideration by SL, up to 2025.


Transit Maps says:

I’ve had this map from Bernie hanging around in my inbox for a while now (sorry, Bernie!), but having just featured the mixed bag of Stockholm’s new official map, this seems the perfect time to show it off.

First off, I love a map with a good visual hook, and Bernie’s interpretation of the L22 as a ring line (which it kind of is) works perfectly in that regard. I also think his inclusion of geography is intelligent, acting as another aid to orientation.

Showing all the extensions up to 2025 means that the map is fully future-proofed already, and it seems that Bernie’s incorporated all the major ones that I know about pretty skilfully, including that commuter rail tunnel under the city and the new Metro line extension to Arenastaden. He’s also integrated the privately-run Arlanda Express line to the airport, which is great to see from an end-user’s point of view. 

Bernie’s added more colour to his version as well, but I feel that it’s used a little more intelligently than the official map: all the commuter rail lines are shades of a slightly recessive purple, for example, which visually drops them just a little lower in the information hierarchy. His mode differentiation is a little better executed – even in the small image size allowed by Tumblr, the light rail and commuter rail lines feel visually “lighter” than those of the Metro – but the difference between all the modes could be emphasised even a little more, I feel.

Our rating: A decidedly different approach to the new official map, and arguably more successful. Three-and-a-half stars.

Submission – New Rail Transit Map for Stockholm, Sweden, 2015 (with Before/After)

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Kristofer Kåring, who says:

Stockholm Transit (SL) has made official a new railway/metro/tram map. News article (in Swedish) about it here.

I think the new gray design is more appealing, and I like that they don’t stretch short branches any longer (like T14 to Fruängen and T17 to Skarpnäck), but the extra bends on T10 are ugly.

Transit Maps says:

The new map (the second of the two images above) is certainly very striking with its elegant grey background and multitudinous coloured lines, but is it actually more usable? I have my doubts.

It would seem that the emphasis of the map has changed drastically, as the previous map had the Tunnelbana (metro/subway) squarely front and centre in bright colours, with the light rail/tram and commuter rail in secondary roles. However, the new map seems to take more of a “complete rail transit” approach, with every line getting its own colour. I feel this actually works against mode differentiation, as it’s now much harder to tell the three different modes apart. Yes, there’s a very thin lighter stroke down the middle of the tram/light rail route lines and a very thin darker stroke down the middle of the commuter rail lines, but it’s a lot of hard work to tell those apart, especially at any distance (I’ll bet you can’t see them at all in the image above, right?).

Compare this to the simplicity of the previous version. Tunnelbana: colours. Tram/light rail: grey. Commuter rail: black. Got it. Very few of the light rail lines actually interact with each other (acting for the most part as feeder lines to the main Metro system), so the introduction of colours doesn’t actually add much useful meaning to the map.

A potential future problem: the L12 light rail line is shown as yellow: the same as the colour that was voted in for the planned Tunnelbana extension to Arenastaden. Other planned future extensions – including the new commuter rail tunnel under central Stockholm – could be problematic for this map to accommodate without extensive redrawing.

One thing I will defend on the new map is the “ugly” extra bends on the T10 line. As noted by Daniel Firth, the previous map shows the Huvudsta Metro station as being directly adjacent to the Bällsta bro tram stop, when in reality there’s a good 20 minute walk between them. The extra curves in the T10 line correct this error and place Huvudsta in a much better position relative to Bällsta bro.

Our rating: Shiny and new, but seems to have more colours just for the sake of it. Mode differentiation is far more difficult than on the old map, and could lead to unrealistic service level expectations from visitors unfamiliar with Stockholm, especially for the commuter rail services, which have much longer headways than the Metro or light rail/tram. Doesn’t seem to be very future-proofed. Two-and-a-half stars.