Official Map: Washington D.C. Metro “Rush+” System Map, 2012

comments 2
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Even though I’ve never been there, I have a history with the Washington, D.C. Metro system. My redesign of it has proved very popular, winning the Peoples’ choice award in last year’s Greater Greater Washington “Redesign the Metro Map” competition. My general dislike of the venerable official map is fairly well known, but it’s still exciting to see this new version, the first stepping stone on the way to the map that will be needed once Silver Line service begins.

Have we been there? No.

What we like: Definite improvements over the last Metro map. The huge, intrusive callout boxes that dominated that map have gone, resulting in a much cleaner look. The downside of this is that the reduced peak (or is that “Reduced Peak+” now?) services on the Yellow Line are not indicated in any way.

The new subtitles for longer station names (an excellent result out of GGW’s competition) are easily the best thing on the map, and I will just quietly note that two things on this map made their first appearance on my own version: letters at the end of routes to signify their colors (although I only used one letter; R, G, B, Y, etc.), and the jog in the south-eastern part of the Green Line to place the Southern Avenue and Naylor Road stations in more geographically-correct locations.

What we don’t like: Let’s leave the overall look of the map out of this argument. While I’m not – and never will be – a fan of the overly thick, almost child-like route lines, they are here to stay. The map is a symbol of D.C., ( but I’m not going to call the map “iconic”) and too much has been invested in it for that to ever change.

So what really bugs me about this map is a total and utter lack of craftsmanship. I’ve attached a couple of example pictures above to illustrate what I mean.

In the first picture (from the legend of the map), you can see that even though the type in the colored route legend circles is the same size as the text that comes after it, they do not share a common baseline. There’s absolutely no reason why the circles can’t be moved up to align properly.

The second picture shows just a small area of the Red Line, but this type of problem is rife across the entire map. There is simply no standard set for how elements align to other elements. I’ve drawn some guides onto the picture to illustrate: the parking symbols align differently to each of the four stations shown, and the MARC symbol at Silver Spring does not align with the station name’s baseline.

Other examples of slipshod work: the hospital symbol at Foggy Bottom aligning to nothing, clashing type between the main name and subtitle at Dunn Loring-Merrifield, the District Diamond still not forming a perfect square (everything else is at 45-degree angles, why isn’t it?)… I could go on and on!

Our rating: Informationally, a competent update of the previous map, but I can’t look past the glaring technical errors. Two-and-a-half stars.

Source: WMATA Rush+ information page – link no longer active

Official Map: Transports en Commun Lyonnais System Map, Lyon, France, 2012

comment 1
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Requested by clubmaintenant.

Another fine example of a multimodal map, this time from Lyon, France. This map shows Métro, tram, bus and funicular service, as well as indications of connections to SNCF mainline train services in a map that wears its London Underground influences on its sleeve.

Have we been there? No.

What we like: Lovely clear layout, with almost all lines reduced to horizontals or verticals – only a few 45-degree route lines are to be seen. The typeface used is quite lovely, and may be custom: the PDF names it as “Confluence”, which is certainly apt for the city that sits at the confluence of the Saone and Rhone rivers. Excellent informational hierarchy, with terminus stations clearly shown via a black box with reversed text, and route lines at their thickest for the Métro and thinnest for bus routes.

What we don’t like: The letters that denote each transportation mode (“M”, “T”, “F” and “C”) end up looking too similar because of the consistent red background. Perhaps different colours or even different shapes could have been used to differentiate them a little more. The combined letters ad route numbers also take up quite a lot of space on the map, and can be a little hard to decipher at stations where many routes converge. Not sure of the utility of the unnamed station markers on the bus routes: are you meant to count stops to find where you want to get off?

Our rating: Clean, easy to read and quite charming. Four stars.

Source: Official TCL website – link no longer active

Photo: Direccion

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps, Photography

I love this old wayfinding route map in the Madrid Metro.

Source: Leticia Ayuso/Flickr

Project: Boston MBTA Map Redesign

comments 39
Filed Under:
Future Maps, My Transit Maps, Unofficial Maps

Back in January, I posted a review of the current Boston MBTA transit map on the blog – and I had some harsh words for it (I believe the phrase “hot mess” occurs in the text). Always one to back my words up with actions, I’ve been quietly working on my own revised version that I feel improves the map in quite a few areas. I’ve also created a few different versions to illustrate some points about the design, so hang in there: this could be a long post!

The image at the top of the post shows the same information as the current official MBTA map, with the addition of all stations on the Green Line branches, not just the accessible ones, and all stations on the Silver Line BRT. This does mean that my map is not the same square format as the current map, and I fully admit that to achieve that square format, you must omit stations on the Green Line. However, I wanted to see what the map looked like with all stations named – so my maps are unapologetically in a wider format.

Other changes from the official map: a tweaking of all the subway line colours to slightly deeper, richer hues that seem to suit Boston better than plain old red, blue, green and orange. I felt it was especially important for the Red Line, which is red because it goes to Harvard, which has crimson as its colour.

Depiction of the Silver Line routes as thinner, separate routes that make their routing easier to follow, especially for the SL4 and SL5 lines around Chinatown and Boylston. Despite attempts to convince people otherwise, the Silver Line is not part of the subway system, it’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and needs to be visually differentiated from the actual subway lines.

The underlying geography is now show in a stylised, rectlinear form that matches the depiction of the routes themselves. One of my pet peeves is angular transit maps that insist on putting these routes on “real” geography. The geography always ends up totally distorted to fit the routes anyway, and I find the clash of styles very jarring.

A firm hierarchy of routes: The subway routes and the Silver Line (the most important information on the map) sit at the top, then commuter rail, then bus routes, then (least importantly), ferry routes at the bottom. If lines do not interact with each other when they cross, they are separated by a thin white keyline. The routes lines also become correspondingly thinner the lower down the information hierarchy they fall.

A complete reworking of the Green Line branches to better match their real-life layout (although in a perfect world, the “C” branch would be straight along its entire length). This also allowed me to introduce a thin dotted black line between Chestnut Hill Ave, Cleveland Circle and Reservoir stations to indicate that they are within walking distance of each other (in effect, an out-of-system transfer), which I’ve also used between Boylston and Chinatown stations.

A visual indication that the Blue Line between Government Center and Bowdoin is only open for the working week, rather than the easy to miss asterisk on the current map.

Station labels are limited to horizontal and angled 45 degrees up to the right. I normally strive to get all station names horizontal, but the Green Line branches make that impossible in this situation. It’s still an improvement on the current map, which uses more variants of angled text.

Station markers have been made as linear as possible, which I think is a great improvement over the knobbly, multi-armed markers used currently.

I’ve also fixed a few errors that I found on the official map, mainly to do with bus routes (especially the 66, and the 15, 22 and 23 which should all go through Roxbury Crossing on their way to Ruggles).

This variation shows all current routes like the first map, but omits the key bus routes. Of note is how much cleaner the map looks instantly – almost nothing else has changed at all. The other main improvement in this variant is that the labelling of the stations on the S4 and S5 lines near Dudley Square gets a lot neater because we don’t have to deal with the #1 bus route!

One thing you may have noticed with the two maps above is the new way I’ve treated the Lowell commuter rail line: running at a 45-degree angle instead of straight up like on the current map. Why have I done this? Because the map has had the future built into it – as all well-designed transit maps should. The currently-planned Green Line Extension will run along much of the same right-of-way as the Lowell Line, so I’ve moved it to a position where this can be achieved easily.

Here’s a map with the future routes added. Nothing has had to be moved; everything just slots into place perfectly.

Even better is this future map without the key bus routes, which allows the new stations (Newmarket, Four Corners/Geneva, Talbot Ave and Blue Hill Ave) on the Fairmount commuter rail line to be respaced a little more evenly and aesthetically.

As always, comments and thoughts are welcome!

Historical Maps: West and East Berlin, 1984

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Further to my previous posts, here’s a couple more maps from East and West Berlin, this time from 1984. Both are much better-designed than the examples shown earlier, and West Berlin has taken on the “U-number” line names that we know so well today. No further comments as the basic principles still hold true for each map – presented for comparison and completeness only.

Historical Map: East Berlin U-Bahn and S-Bahn, c. 1989

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

As a direct contrast to my previous post, here’s the East Berlin perspective of transit in that divided city.

Notice anything?

West Berlin has almost been entirely excised from the map: a small, empty, featureless area totally encircled by extensive East German rail lines as well as the Berlin Wall: here referred to as the “state border”. A powerful statement of East German superiority if there ever was one.

Have we been there? Yes.

What we like: As before, the historical and political snapshot of a map like this is astounding.

What we don’t like: Not actually hugely useful as a route map – all the S-Bahn tracks are the same shade of neon green, making it impossible to tell where trains begin and end their journey. Eye-jarring colours: I think there’s actually two different neon greens, but it’s very difficult to tell!

Our rating: Mapping as propaganda. An amazing piece of history. Four-and-a-half stars.

Source: Frank Jacobs’ awesome Strange Maps blog

Historical Map: West Berlin U-Bahn Map, 1977

comment 1
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Berlin’s troubled post-World War II history led to a fascinating dual history for transit in that city, divided into East and West sectors. This West Berlin U-Bahn map from 1977 – at the height of the Cold War – shows that division in a stark, but also curiously understated fashion. The infamous Berlin Wall that completely divided the city is prosaically referred to as a Sektorengrenze, or “sector boundary”.

All U-Bahn lines are still shown, but the East Berlin-exclusive lines are rendered as thin black lines with the legend, “Railway stations which can be reached only with the trains of the East BGV”.

At the same time, stations on the 6 and 8 lines passing through the East Sector are crossed out. Here, the legend reads, “Railway stations where trains do not stop”. These are the infamous Geisterbahnhofe, or “ghost stations”, patrolled by East German border guards to prevent unauthorised crossings into West Berlin. The one station in East Berlin that remained open was Friedrichstrasse, an official checkpoint between the two sectors.

Interestingly, the S-Bahn is not represented at all on the map: it was entirely controlled by East Germany at this time, even when it ran through West Berlin. As a result, West Berliners were encouraged to boycott the S-Bahn to prevent funding the Soviet-controlled state (even though West Berlin also paid a massive annual fee to East Germany to allow U-Bahn trains to travel through the East sector).

Have we been there? Yes, in 2004, long after the collapse of the Wall. Pretty much the only part I saw was a single segment near Potzdamer Platz.

What we like: Fascinating historical and political snapshot.

What we don’t like: Not going to win any awards for its outstanding design. Its primitive design and thin paper (you can clearly see what’s printed on the other side) probably reflect the austerity of the times.

Our rating: Fascinating! Four stars.

Did you enjoy this post? Do you visit Transit Maps regularly? Consider supporting the site with a small monthly donation via Patreon. Your support makes it possible for me to continue bringing you great content!

Become a Patron!

Source: Robert Reynolds’ Subway Map Scans Collection

Official Map: Metro de Santiago, Chile, 2012

comments 3
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Here’s another example of a metro map overlaid on a city’s street grid – this time from Santiago, Chile. This system has some marvellous innovations, with a bike sharing program (BiciMetro) and libraries (BiblioMetro) integrated at many stations, but the map somewhat fails to live up to those modern, forward-thinking ideas.

Have we been there? No.

What we like: Clean layout, with large easy-to-read (if not particularly stylish) text. The roads are given the right informational weight – they’re there if you need them, but don’t detract from the main purpose of the map.

What we don’t like: Some very clumsy curves where routes change direction, especially on Line 5 between Las Parcelas and Del Sol and then through Baquedano.

The express route on Line 1 seems very tacked on and suffers from Adobe Illustrator “Rounded Corners” syndrome – the curves don’t nest properly with the main Line 1 route and it looks very ugly.

Some sections of the map seem overly cramped in comparison with other parts, probably a consequence of letting the street grid dictate layout.

Finally, it’s all well and good to show us where the airport is (way over there to the northwest of the city), but how the heck do we get there?

Our rating: Functional, but a little clumsy and inelegant in parts. Three stars.

Did you enjoy this post? Do you visit Transit Maps regularly? Consider supporting the site with a small monthly donation via Patreon. Your support makes it possible for me to continue bringing you great content!

Become a Patron!

Source: Metro de Santiago website

Photo: Early MARTA Rail Map, c. 1974-1979

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps, Photography

A photo from our good friend, Matt’ Johnson, showing a very early system map (circa 1974 to 1979) for the MARTA commuter rail system in Atlanta. Compare to the current map here. Click on the source link at the bottom of the post to read Matt’s comprehensive notes over on Flickr.

I’ll just note that I really like the clean, uncluttered design; especially the subtle grey background with the underlying and unlabelled road network reversed out in white.

Source: tracktwentynine/Flickr

Official Map: Los Angeles Metro Bus and Rail Services

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

I really, really don’t know what to think about this map. On one hand, it looks amazing, with a solid and well applied design theme. On the other, it’s so rich with information (with around 200 Metro-run routes plus those of Municipal bus operators!) that’s it’s almost impossible to make anything out clearly.

Maybe this is a case of form over function, or maybe it needs to be viewed at it’s actual poster dimensions (which, according to the original PDF are 47 inches along each side).

So a question to my LA readers – have you ever actually used this map? Is it helpful, or does it make your head spin?

Have we been there? Yes, but haven’t caught a bus or a train there.

What we like: Lovely looking design, tying in well with Metro’s whole corporate look. Incredibly comprehensive.

What we don’t like: The limited colour palette (one colour for each type of service) makes it hard to follow routes in complex areas – you have to rely on finding the next instance of the route number you’re trying to follow, which isn’t always easy. Route termini need to be marked more clearly.

Our rating: ?????

Source: LA Metro website