Official Map: Bus and Tram Network Map, Strasbourg, France, 2012

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

In general, I hold European transit maps in better regard than maps from other parts of the world. Crisp, clear European graphic design and transit maps just seem to be made for each other! Of course, there’s always exceptions to the rule, and this map from the Compagnie des Transports Strasbourgeois (CTS) in Strasbourg, France is one of those exceptions.

Have we been there? Yes, in December 2003. I found the trams pretty easy to navigate at the time.

What we like: Not a lot. Seriously, this thing hurts my eyes.

What we don’t like: Ugly, ugly, ugly. Black edges on all the route lines makes the map look very heavy, despite its light yellow background.

The typography is extremely poor – the main typeface used is Helvetica Neue, but it has been horizontally scaled to create a faux condensed version, instead of using the actual Helvetica Neue Condensed font. Even worse, the amount of scaling it has been given varies from place to place across the map, depending on how much text the designers need to squeeze in. And squeeze it in they must, because the centre of the map is absolutely jam-packed with routes, station names and icons. Not helping this cramped feeling are the enormous boxed-in route terminus names and the biggest (and possibly ugliest) Park-and-Ride icons I’ve ever seen.

There’s also an error in the legend: Stops that only serve one direction should be shown as a dot with a black arrow pointing in the direction of travel, but the legend shows no station marker at all.

Our rating: Yuck. One-and-a-half stars.

Source: Official CTS website

Photo: Tyne & Wear Metro In-Car Map

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps, Photography

If anything, I actually like this elongated layout better than the actual official system map (reviewed here) – the removal of the geography and the addition of zone information makes the design both cleaner and more useful. Great use of an awkward space.

Source: LiamC1995/Flickr

Historical Maps: Berlin S- and U-Bahn Maps, 1910-1936

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Wow. Just wow. These amazing transit maps of early 20th Century Berlin are just a few samples of the maps that can be found at the BerlinerVerkehr website – an absolute treasure trove that transit geeks like me can easily lose hours to. Five stars for this collection, obviously!

All of these maps are of interest, but there’s a few things that really stand out:

  • The “Hoch-und Untergrundbahn” logo used on the 1914 and 1918 maps closely echoes the similar “London Underground” logo of the same time period.
  • The clearly diagrammatic nature of some of the maps, even as early as 1923 (ten years before Beck’s London Underground diagram!). The 1926 U-Bahn map eschews geography completely, while the 1931 S-Bahn map – with its stylised and perfectly circular Ring Line – looks almost modern in its approach.
  • The 1930 Railways and S-Bahn map is actually a historical overview of the history of the network to that date, with colour coding delineating which years certain lines were built in.

Visual Message: Metro Message by Tim Fishlock

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Illustrations

Nicely done — even if some of the letters are a bit of a stretch — but Animals on the Underground is more fun.

Source: Tim Fishlock

Official Map: Metro do Porto, Portugal, 2012

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Porto, Portugal’s Metro light rail system is only ten years old, but is already a comprehensive and far-reaching network. With such a modern transit system, it’s important to have a map to match, and in most respects, this one certainly fits the bill. But does everything have to be so small?

Have we been there? No.

What we like: Some beautifully crafted elements, especially the bespoke icons for connecting services (bus, train, airport, etc.) Too many maps use the standard and dated ESRI icons for these, but these match the light, airy feel of the map perfectly.

The curves in the route lines are also beautifully executed, being wide and flowing throughout. I especially like the little s-curve from the Aeroporto station at the north end of the “E” (purple) line through to Verdes station.

What we don’t like: While beautifully designed, at anything but the actual poster size of 48×68 cm (around 19×27 inches), many of the elements are just too small. The route lines become very lightweight and spindly, while the “superscripted” parking symbol becomes almost invisible. As the map is downloadable as a PDF from the agency’s website, I feel better thought has to be given as to how the map displays on screen.

Our rating: A stylish and modern map to match a stylish and modern light rail system. Let down slightly by the smallness of some elements. Three-and-a-half stars.

Source: Metro de Porto website

Photo: All Is Fare In Love & Brooklyn

comment 1
Filed Under:
Photography, Unofficial Maps

The clearest photo I’ve seen yet of this subway map-themed mural in Brooklyn, New York. Aesthetically, it seems to have more in common with the London Tube Map than the subway map of its own city.

Photo: June 18, 2012 by Matt’ Johnson

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Photography

It’s coming! WMATA’s Rush Plus map and service changes are almost here, and ads are appearing on Metro trains around D.C.

Source: tracktwentynine/Flickr

Official Map: Vancouver, BC Frequent Transit Network, 2012

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Here’s a question I received from Tumblr user pw3n:

“TransLink (in Vancouver) just released their first official Frequent Transit Network map. A lot could be said about the design (in particular, the apparent lack of craftsmanship), but that’s not what I want to ask you about. The first thing I noticed was a lack of route numbers. At first I was annoyed. But then I thought: do I care what bus is coming by, as long as there’s a bus coming? Basically: is the corridor or the route more important? What are your thoughts on frequent transit maps?”

In general, I think showing service frequency on a map is a good thing and it’s something that’s not done enough by transit agencies. I feel that you can get away without showing frequency on a map that concentrates on one mode with a known service frequency – everyone expects trains to come frequently on the New York subway, for example – but it’s definitely needed on mixed-mode maps like this.

That said, I’m not sure that this FTN map is particularly useful for travellers. My problem is mainly with the bus corridors (as per pw3n’s initial thoughts): there’s no indication of which routes serve the corridors or where any buses actually go. As a transit user, I would say that’s the most important thing for a transit map to show: If I get on a bus here, can I go there? This map doesn’t show that information at all, and I actually feel that TransLink’s previous Transit Connections map did a much better job that this map as the bus routes shown are clearly labelled.

Another problem with this map is that it creates the idea that infrequent service (those routes which exist but don’t meet the criteria for inclusion on this map) equals no service. Out of sight, out of mind, so to speak. I far prefer to see frequency information incorporated into a full system map, like the previously-reviewed and quite excellent Spokane Transit map.

One thing this map does do well is show gaps in the frequent service network, so it may actually be quite useful for future planning. But as a tool for travellers, I don’t think it’s actually that useful.

Source: TransLink Buzzer Blog

Photo: Transit Map Station Art – Phoenix, Arizona

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Photography, Unofficial Maps

These are nice! Anyone got better photos of each installation?

You can see what they’re trying to do with this art: look at all the great transit systems of the world portrayed here: Frankfurt! London! Moscow! … and (by association) … Phoenix. Yeah, right.

Source: crume/Flickr

Ads: “Your Life On Track” for Phoenix Metro Light Rail

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Advertising

Hardly the most original idea in the world, but nicely executed.

More details:
Advertising Agency: Park&Co, Phoenix Arizona, USA
Creative Director: Luis Medina
Senior Art Director: Shawn Hardy
Copywriter: Dan Oboyle
Published: June 2011

Source: helloyoucreatives