Submission – Great Britain National Rail Route Diagram by Andrew Smithers

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Andrew, who says:

This latest version of the diagram now features correct geographic orientation at junctions. The previous maps were nodal (major stations were shown as hubs where trains can arrive and depart in any direction, sometimes reversing) to keep straight line trajectories as long as possible. See the Southampton example for then and now. The map is now more curvy with a softer less angular appearance which I believe users will prefer. Careful control of radii at junctions has helped keep the long straight line trajectories. Now it’s been given the full go ahead, HS2 phase 2b has been added. A new colour palette enables high speed to be picked out showing how the HS2 fits into the existing network. The map is a major development and to make it appear new and different I’ve used a more artistic sea abstract with rounded corners to the coastline.

Transit Maps says:

First, let me just recognise what an enduring project this is – Andrew’s first draft of this map dates back to 1997, and this is its thirtieth major revision, which is quite astounding. Andrew also makes a version that breaks everything up by rail operator, but I’ve always felt that this “overview” version is a little cleaner and easier to understand. Displaying an entire national rail network in a clean diagrammatic way is no easy task, but I think Andrew does a great job and each revision sees improvements.

I particularly like the new colour palette this time around: the teal and orange are quite striking, and the use of the the orange for icons instead of the previous grey is quite inspired. I’m not as sold on the wavy background, though: it’s overly busy and draws attention away from the actual diagram. If it was overlaid at a much lighter opacity on a light blue background as a subtle effect I think I’d like it more. The large black drop shadow is also a bit too powerful for me – reduce the radius, drop the opacity or make it a multiplied blue to reduce its visual intensity and brighten the map up a bit.

With this revision, Andrew has introduced more generous curves throughout, which does help with comprehension of some of the local routes. It also introduces a bit of a visual “pause” in some of the longer straight routes: the eyes naturally rest on Exeter St. Davids on the way out to Penzance, for example. I quite like it, and it’s definitely interesting to compare the approach taken by this map to the previous iteration in this detail from around Southampton. It just seems a little more elegant, perhaps?

One thing I always look for in a big mapping project like this is consistency in the design language. One thing that really stands out to me is Andrew’s use of large arcs in just two parts of the map: between Aberdeen and Inverness in Scotland, and between Barrow-in-Furness and Carlisle skirting around the edge of the Lake District. They look great, but are also somewhat inconsistent with the angularity of the rest of the map. So I think that it’d be nice if similar arcs could be incorporated elsewhere to make their use more consistent. The obvious first place for me would be the line between Colchester and Stowmarket – which is basically already an arc except it’s made up out of straight segments – and there may be others as well.

Overall though, this is a really good new iteration of an already impressive project and I can’t wait to see what Andrew does with it next. Definitely one to spend a long time poring over!

Note that even though this isn’t technically an official National Rail map, it does appear on the National Rail Enquiries website directly below the official ones – which allows for an easy comparision between them.

Source: Project Mapping website

Official Map: Sound Transit Line Nomenclature from 2021, Seattle

comments 2
Filed Under:
Official Maps, Visualizations

Sound Transit’s network will expand rapidly in the near future – with new Link light rail lines, extensions to the Tacoma Link streetcar and Sounder commuter rail, as well as the new Stride BRT lines along SR 523/SR 522 and I-405. With all these new services, Sound Transit has to come up with a way to identify all of them on future maps.

Originally, the current Link light rail spine was going to be renamed as the Red Line, with future lines gaining new colours as they came online. However, the local community was quick to point out the similarity of that name to the racist practice of redlining, where people of colour were denied loans or insurance, defining where in a city they could live. Though Sound Transit acknowledges that there are many other Red Lines around the world, they also chose to act decisively and change their plans at this early stage.

So now we have five Link lines – four of which will be numbered as the main network, while the separate Tacoma Link streetcar will be the “T Line”. The Stride network will get an “S” prefix before their numbers, and the Sounder lines will become the “N Line” and “S Line” after the directions trains travel out of Seattle. To show off this new system, Sound Transit has made this nifty little animated GIF showing how the network will change over time as each new component comes on line. Neat!

The colours actually work well when placed together on the map, and Sound Transit says that though has gone into making them user-friendly for colour-blind readers, which is good to hear. The other thing to note is that there’s still 21 years to go until the system is built out fully, which is like FOREVER.

Source: Sound Transit blog

Fantasy Map: Capital Monorail, Washington DC (1960s) by Michael Tyznik

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Fantasy Maps

I’m not quite sure how I missed this one when Michael posted it to Twitter back at the beginning of March, because it’s really quite wonderful. It seems to be based on a 1959 proposal by O. Roy Chalk – the then owner of D.C. Transit – for a monorail system. Chalk considered traditional rail as obsolete, while monorail represented the future: “beautiful, silent-operating… suspended on graceful pylons for the most part.” You can read more about Chalk’s plans over here at Greater Greater Washington.

Chalk’s plan was light on details, and wasn’t seriously considered at the time. But what if it had been? This is the question that Michael’s map seems to ask, and shows the network in its fully built-out form, dating it to the mid-to-late 1960s in this alternate reality. I have to say that Michael’s absolutely nailed the mid-century American design aesthetic: big, bold, extended sans serif typography; and limited colours with overprinting used very effectively to extend the palette’s range. I love the rough halftones used for the waterways: they really add to the overall look and feel.

Our final word: A great “what if” map that absolutely looks the part. I love it!

Source: Michael Tyznik/Twitter

Submission – Unofficial Map: Transit Network of Gothenburg, Sweden by Jens Svanfelt

comment 1
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Jens, who says:

Made a map of the public transport network in Gothenburg, Sweden. The official one (August 2018, 3 stars) just doesn’t look very good I think.

Transit Maps says:

This is a lovely effort, Jens – the map certainly seems to relate the tram line routes to the real world far better than the official map, which is stretched vertically quite a lot (to fit a required space?). The typography is very clean and friendly, and the beige background is much warmer and cheerier than the drab grey of the official map. Calling out Brunnsparken as the main transit hub with a bold circle interchange works well: it certainly draws the reader’s eye to it!

The one main problem with the map is the white Line 1, which almost completely disappears into the light background. Although I’m not normally a proponent of this approach, this line really needs to be cased with a darker colour (maybe a darker version of the background rather than black) to allow sufficient contrast with the background. Or maybe Jens just forgets about the line colour inherited from the official map and assigns it another one?

The map could also do with a better legend which names all the lines and the termini that they run between properly, and maybe explains why bus line 55 is green when all the others are brown. What’s special about it? Don’t assume that the reader knows!

Keep an eye on consistency regarding where line number bullets are placed at the terminus stations: in most locations, the numbers are placed nearest the stations, except at Mölndal, where they’re placed after the station name.

The coastline and rivers looks a little rough and unfinished in comparison to the rest of the map, but this is a fairly minor complaint.

Our final word: Rather pleasant to look at, very warm and welcoming. Definitely shows why very few transit networks have a “White Line” – so problematic!

Submission – Official Map: Bus Map of Belluno, Italy, 2020

comments 4
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Luca, who says:

This is the official transit map of Belluno, Italy, made by the provider of the service, Dolomitibus. It represents the 8 bus lines operating in Belluno, each with its own color: A=Orange (Arancio), B=Blue, C=Light Blue (Celeste), etc…

It’s extremely schematic, as it’s far from the real paths buses follow. For example, the Blue and the Green lines are, in the upper half of the map, represented as adjacent lines, while they actually run on different streets. It’s also missing some stops. I leave the more artistic part for you to review.

I dislike it so much I created my own version, and since the current system is very poor and messy I created a “project” map of how the lines should be. I will submit both of these at later times.

Transit Maps says:

I’m definitely interested to see what Luca’s vision for this network is, as this map is a bit of a mess. Schematic bus maps are a tricky thing to pull off successfully, as bus maps normally require more spatial relationship to the real world than less. This diagram makes a valiant effort by blocking out all the comunes surrounding Belluno in tints of the relevant line colours, but it’s just not very successful or aesthetically appealing. Tinted yellow labels on a tinted yellow background are almost unreadable, for example.

The Piave River, which should be a major landmark in orienting users on the map, just meanders across the page and barely resembles its real-world self. Worse still, the Borgo Piave – Distributore Agip stop on the “C” and “J” lines is shown on the wrong side of the river (it should be on the south bank)!

If there’s one thing I do like about the map, it’s the line naming convention where the line letter comes the first letter of the corresponding colour in Italian. A = Ariancio (orange), C= Celeste (light blue), etc. Simple and sweet.

Our final word: Not great. Too schematic for its own good, confusing and unattractive. 1 star.

Source: Dolomitibus website

Submission – Unofficial Map: RFTA Winter Bus Service in Aspen, Colorado by Joseph Van Harn

comment 1
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Joseph, who says:

I recently completed an unofficial map of Roaring Fork Transportation Authority winter bus service in Aspen, Colorado (80 x 40 cm, Affinity Designer). I decided to take on this project in response to the official maps’ collective failure to portray the system’s Upvalley services. RFTA’s system map lacks detail south of Brush Creek and directs the viewer to a nonexistent “Aspen inset,” and the City of Aspen’s bus map shows no cohesion with RFTA’s map, let alone route legibility.

Much of what I know about transit map design is from reading this blog, so I established five objectives before undertaking the project:

  1. Show visual cohesion with RFTA’s official maps;
  2. Depict the winter routes’ complex service patterns;
  3. Display connections to other transit services, trails, and key gondola portals;
  4. Reference secondary information (e.g. fares and connecting services) with restraint;
  5. Focus on the Aspen/Snowmass/Highlands service area and refer to the official map for downvalley services.

In creating this map, I learned a lot about setting angled lines on a biaxial grid, label placement, and information hierarchy. In the end, I’m rather pleased with the outcome, and I look forward to your feedback.

Transit Maps says:

This is really, really nice work, Joseph! You’ve done a good job of not just mimicking the official RFTA style, but perhaps even improving upon it a bit – all your labels are set horizontally, for example. The route lines are laid out clearly and neatly, and the one-direction-only stops are quickly identifiable. I particularly like the inclusion of ski area gondolas as “routes” on the map: a nice touch for a winter services map in Aspen!

The four purple Snowmass routes are perhaps the hardest to work out, and I think an “SMI” bullet at Brush Creek would definitely help people understand that it’s just a short shuttle route between Snowmass and Brush Creek. I also think that unless the colours used are taken from official sources, you might explore using brighter colours for the City of Aspen services and more pastelly colours for the Regional services, just to be able to tell them apart a bit more easily at first glance. Thematic colour can be a powerful tool on a map like this!

Another thing to try might be a slightly more organic look for the rivers running through the valley: they look a bit too much like subsidiary route lines at the moment and could be better differentiated if possible.

Our last word: Really quite wonderful. Great work, Joseph!

Submission – Unofficial Map: Bay Area Transit Strip Map by Fern Kusnetzoff-Hahn

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Fern, who says:

A few weeks ago, i made a fairly rough strip map of almost all Bay Area passenger rail services using some pens and graph paper. I was wondering if you’d like to review it?

Transit Maps says:

A nice effort at a Bay Area-wide topological diagram, Fern! It certainly fits into the long, narrow proportions of your average strip map nicely. I particularly like the use of a “half-grid” for the local Muni Metro services. Of course, labelling everything on a compact diagram like this can be tricky, so it’d be interesting to see how well this concept stands up under that load.

See also: Burrito Justice’s “reductio ad absurdum” topological diagram of BART

Historical Map: Metropolitan Railway Plan for Stockholm, 1965

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Here’s a great mid-20th Century planning map showing proposed extensions to the Stockholm Metro in 1965. The blue lines show what was already built (or about to be built) at the time, while the different types of green lines show proposed additions at varying levels of planning: solid for planned, dashed for an extension without a full alignment study, and dotted for unstudied alternative extensions. It’s definitely interesting to compare this map to what has been built out in reality!

Source: City of Stockholm Archives

Submission – Official Map: Banff National Park Public Transit, Canada

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Alexis Hunt, who says:

This transit map (in brochure form) covers the bus network in the area stretching from Canmore to Lake Louise in Alberta, about 80 km from end to end. There’s a lot of information to unpack in here, but here’s a few things we found particularly interesting or worth noting:

  • A lot of schematic maps try to simplify geometry in order to make the relation between routes and the lines more interesting to follow. This map, on the other hand, actually makes it more complicated, showing the Trans-Canada Highway doing a full 180 around Tunnel Mountain in order to fit the mountain on the page without an inset, while in reality it only does about 90 degrees before continuing on to Canmore.
  • It’s easy to miss just how far apart these towns really are, from looking at this map. Many commuter transit maps relax the scale a lot as they get into suburbs, but there’s about a 16:1 difference in scale in this map! Between the junction of the TCH and the Bow Valley Parkway (highway 1A) in the bottom left, and the Lake Louise Park and Ride, is close to 48 kilometers, while the part of Canmore depicted on this map is only about 3 km long in its entirety.
  • You’ll note that they recorded the actual distances between several locations on the map, to help get a sense of scale. It’s got to be a very difficult challenge to properly convey those distances without losing too much resolution.
  • Many of the locations on this map, especially on the seasonal routes, are tourist destinations, reflecting the tourist-heavy interest, particularly in the summer, in the area.
  • Different shapes of stop markers are used to indicate dropoff-only and pickup-only stops. This is neat, as marker shape doesn’t seem to be a common place to put variation, but it’s doesn’t add much visual busyness and it gives us fond feelings of Mini Metro. In some places (such as the Benchlands Trail overpass in Canmore) it can be difficult to tell if a marker is a circle or square, though.
  • It’s not clear what the hatching (don’t know the technical terms) on parts of the Moraine Lake and On-It services is for. This is commonly used to indicate future construction, but this makes no sense in context. We actually can’t figure it out for sure, but it looks like the Moraine Lake route is distinguishing between the incoming and outgoing routes, and trying to indicate that there isn’t through service, while on the On-It service it seems to be trying to distinguish between the trips which do and do not serve Canmore (see the schedule).
  • The Canmore local Roam route 5 service doesn’t appear on this map, probably in part because this map is by Parks Canada rather than the Bow Valley Regional Transit Commission, and partly for space reasons. (It’s worth noting that we couldn’t find a full-system map from the BVRTC for their Roam services.)
  • The map sets out full service and fare details of the various routes, including what you can bring with you on the bus, no doubt in part because of the tourist audience and in part because there is very little in the way of regularity to the fares and service dates.
  • The thinner lines in the inset area in Banff to let them fit in is a nice touch.
  • Stops served in both directions are inconsistently notated with either both arrows (in Lake Louise area) or none (elsewhere).
  • The area is beautiful and absolutely a destination worth visiting if you get the chance, although the crowds are getting pretty bad these days.

Transit Maps says:

First off, my apologies to Alexis — this map has been sitting in my queue for ages, and I really should have gotten to it earlier.

Yes, this map has some problems with variable scale and the draftsmanship is a little dodgy in places (there’s some very unconvincing curves around corners), but I’m going to give it full marks for getting this kind of information out there. As National Parks around the world get more and more popular, we need to find ways to cut down on the use of single-occupancy vehicles within the parks themselves. A brochure/map like this that makes public transportation in and around the park look easy and accessible is only to be commended.

Like Alexis, I particularly like the comprehensive table at the bottom left that clearly outlines all the fare and service details for all the routes — this is great information for potential riders to have. If anything, I’d like to see more emphasis given to the cost-effectiveness of buying multi-day passes for the Roam network ($12 for three days is a pretty good deal!), so that people can make educated decisions about their transportation choices.

The differing scales in the map could perhaps be dealt with by drawing break lines across the Trans-Canada Highway between the major areas, just to make it clear that the distances between them are larger than shown. The inclusion of distances as labels does mitigate the need for this a bit, though.

The inset of Banff almost feels unnecessary — it adds very little detail to the depiction of the town on the main map, and almost seems to have been included just to fill up an otherwise empty space.

The “pecked” lines (to use the official term, Alexis) really do just seem to be used to say that not every bus follows this route — it’s more obvious for the brown On-It route to Calgary, as not every bus stops at Canmore, so we have to assume it retains the same meaning for the Moraine Lake service.

I would have refrained from placing the TCH “Route 1” maple leaf directly over intersections — it makes it hard to follow routes through the intersection, especially coming out of Banff itself.

Our final word: A very serviceable map that does a good job of outlining transit options in and around Banff. A little more polish would really make it sing. Three stars.

Source: Parks Canada website

Submission – Official Map: Bus Map of Mataró, Spain, 2020

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Jep, who says:

This is the official system map for my hometown’s transit agency, Mataró Bus. It operates an 8-line bus system with frequencies up to 15 minutes, 365 days a year.

The map itself has undergone a small revamp in 2020, due to minor route changes for lines 3 and 4. Maps of individual lines are also available, as excerpts from the global map.

Mataró is a coastal town 30 km (20 mi) from Barcelona and has some 130,000 inhabitants, covering a total area of 22 sq km (8.7 sq mi). Some suburbs expand to the north (not shown on the map), but they lack regular public transport. The agency’s official ridership figure for 2019 was 4.5 million trips.

Transit Maps says:

A fairly standard bus map here, with routes overlaid on a simplified, ghosted-back street map, which has been rotated quite a bit clockwise to match the local perception of north as being away from the coast. It’s mainly notable for two things:

First, it illustrates the problem of having a lot of concurrent routes on a geographical map, as the routes become much, much wider than the street they’re meant to be travelling along. In places, there are six out of eight possible routes travelling along the same route.

Second, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a bus network where every route is some form of loop. While only lines 1 and 2 get named officially as “Circle Lines”, all the others aren’t far off. It’s almost certainly a by-product of getting buses along narrow city streets, but it sure looks odd on a map!

Our final word: Unremarkable and just about tolerable as a system overview map, but fortunately supported by clearer single maps on the agency website. 2 stars.

Source: Mataró Bus website