Project: Electric Streetcars and Interurbans of Yakima, Washington, 1920

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps, My Transit Maps, Prints Available

The third in my series of maps depicting electric streetcar networks of the Pacific Northwest, one that both builds on my previous maps of Spokane and Portland and adds something new to the mix: geography.

The full project description follows, but you can view the map below or click here to view it in a full-screen window.

At first sight, the Yakima streetcar and interurban network may not look quite as impressive as the other two larger cities (which had dozens of lines each) but there’s one very special aspect that truly sets it apart: it’s still operating.

Opened on Christmas Day 1907, passenger service continued until February 1947 – long after other streetcars had faded away in Washington state – and freight service on the electric interurban lines continued right up to 1985, when the Union Pacific finally abandoned the by-then unprofitable system. However, a small touristic trolley service using the interurban lines had begun in 1974 and has continued up to the present day. If you’re ever in Yakima, be sure to visit the Yakima Valley Trolleys Museum – housed in the original 1910 car barn and power house – and maybe take a ride on one of their historical trolleys along Pine Street or even up to Selah.

For once, researching the lines of the network wasn’t a problem, thanks to Kenneth G. Johnsen’s excellent book Apple Country Interurban, and a whole slew of original engineering blueprints found on the YVT museum’s website. As seen below, the amount of detail on these is incredibly comprehensive and allowed a lot of extra detail to be included on the final map, often even including what kind of facilities were to be found at each stop – ranging from a full depot building down to a simple pole indicating that trains could stop there. City maps from 1918 and Sanborn maps from 1920 provided further supporting details. The only line which still lacks a bit of detail is the interurban line out to Henrybro, for which I haven’t come across a proper map yet.

Instead, the main challenge presented by this map was one of scale: the interurban lines headed far out into the surrounding countryside, making the city lines (the main focus of the previous maps in the series) shrink down into one corner of the map. Almost immediately, I decided that I would use an inset diagram to demonstrate how the city lines worked, while the main map would show the interurban lines in full over a simple one-colour indication of the extent of the city lines. While this worked well, early drafts of the map looked very empty and flat, simply because there was nothing to see in large parts of it!

I got to thinking that I’d like to include an indication of geography in the map, not only to provide some much-needed texture to the flat map, but also to indicate how the railroads were governed by it. The line north from Yakima to Selah had to pass through the narrow Selah Gap, which already had the main Northern Pacific line passing through it. The interurban line follows almost the same path as the NP line, but necessarily higher up the valley wall, making for a spectacular journey through the gap. Similarly, the Cowiche Canyon branch of the North Yakima & Valley Railway has to traverse the eponymous canyon on its way out to Tieton.

A request for assistance in making a suitable hillshade for the map was met by Daniel Huffman, whose willingness to share his knowledge and help others always astounds me. With his hillshade now acting as a canvas for the map, I pretty much redrew all the lines to ensure everything lined up properly (I’d been a little too diagrammatic in that earlier draft!). Quite remarkably, there are a couple of places on the hillshade where the old interurban right-of-way could still be discerned: normally when the line dropped off the edge of a steep hill or similar. As a result of all this work, this is probably as close to an actual geographical map as you’ll ever see from me, though it’s important to note that I’ve still simplified a lot of things and this is definitely not a fully-accurate trackage map (although I could almost make one with all the data I’ve gathered!)

Note that the path of the rivers on the main map are based off city maps of Yakima from 1918, and often show a substantially different path to today’s rivers (seen on the small “Current Trolley Lines” map at the bottom right). The most obvious difference is the presence of the two huge log ponds that were part of the Cascade Lumber Mill on the edge of town – served by the YVT’s North Eighth Street line.

Once the main map was drawn, I adapted the city line diagram from it – separating the eight routes of the time out into their own lines, and indicating some of the common ways that the routes interlined as they passed through downtown by using similar colours for the respective east- and west-side lines. These common interlinings are all taken from the map on the inside cover of Apple Country Interurban, though there’s plenty of photographic evidence within that same book that other interlinings were sometimes used – with interurban cars sometimes even extending their run to the far end of a city line on the east side of town. The YVT only had a small fleet of cars without a lot of redundancy, and I feel that they often just went where they were needed at the time. Headways were never spectacular: most city lines only ran twice an hour, and some just once an hour. Six trains a day went out to Wiley City and Henrybro, while eight a day ran on the Selah Line – four only went as far north as Taylor, while the other four continued all the way to the end of the line at Speyers.

One oddity of the network is the Orchard Line: it’s never included as a city line, nor does it ever appear on interurban timetables. Despite the YVT’s franchise requiring it to carry passengers on all its lines, it seems that this line was treated as more of a freight spur (collecting produce from the farms in the area) than an actual “line”, so it existed in a slightly grey area.

Because there aren’t many lines that needed to be listed in the map’s legend, I’ve included some extra historical information about each of them (opening and closing dates, etc.), as well as a small map of the current trolley operations on Pine Street and out to Selah. Of the 48 miles that operated in 1920, only about five remain in use today.

As always, comments are welcome below! Prints of the map are available for purchase in the Transit Maps print store.

Submission – Official Map: San Diego Trolley Diagram, 2021

comment 1
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Robert, who says:

I’ve always thought that San Diego’s “Trolley” map to be pretty bad, with various clashing angles, line icons and brand names (ugh) that don’t add anything (“Sycuan” is a casino, and the Blue LIne is named UC San Diego because they’re a sponsor, not because the line extension will go there). Only ONE landmark is noted, the baseball park downtown. The only geographical feature indicated is the international border, which isn’t necessarily bad, but if they’re going to note the border, they could also indicate that from San Ysidro station it’s a short walk to Mexico. On the other hand, two stations have airport indicators, yet the airport is far from both of them, and there’s no airport shuttle as such. All in all, it’s just a mess of a map.

Anyway, I was hoping that the MTS would take the opportunity to rethink the map when they open the major extension of the Blue Line north to UC San Diego and “UTC”, which is a major center of offices and housing. I just ran across a new map on the MTS website [and] I’d love to hear your comments! To me, it’s moderately better than the old one, but not great, and I think a design professional (which I’m not) could improve it immensely. It really bugs me that the Orange Line takes a short right angle while all other turns are presented as curves… I also think the broad Orange Line curve at City College is distracting, but maybe that’s unavoidable? What bothers me most is the Orange Line angle in Lemon Grove that does not reflect the angle of the “Euclid Avenue” label that’s next to it. Ouch!

Transit Maps says:

This one’s an interesting beast, Robert – there’s some things I like more than in the old version (left), and some that I don’t. It probably comes out as being better in the long run, but only just. Overall, it’s certainly cleaner and easier to read, with the angled labels being slightly less neck-breaking. The placement of Courthouse station is much better now, without the overwrought way it was brought inside the Silver Line loop previously. An understated but very welcome change is the way that the line name icons have all lost their black outlines (which made them look a bit childish) and now have their names set in the same colour instead of black. It unifies the information and links the names directly to the route lines themselves – so much better!

However, I do miss the unique angles of the previous map, which were very distinctive and perhaps even a little more representative of the actual trajectories of the lines in real life (not always important in a diagram, but still nice to have if possible!). It’s especially noticeable with the downtown loop, which had a very distinctive curved section in its southwestern quadrant, but is now just a regular ol’ rectangle.

Speaking of the loop, the Silver Line – a heritage trolley, not full light rail – is still a bit problematic. It only runs in a clockwise loop because the PCC streetcars on the line are only single-ended, and it only runs on weekends – neither of which are indicated on the map. It also doesn’t get any station dots, which perhaps indicates that it was included somewhat grudgingly on the diagram. A directional arrow or two might fix the first problem; and a more comprehensive map legend the second.

The sharp right-angle turn that the Orange Line takes at 12th & Imperial is perhaps a little unfortunate, but seemingly unavoidable if the Green and Orange lines are to create a unified horizontal line across the diagram. There are potential solutions like staggering the station dots at 12th & Imperial, but something like that might come across as over-designed on a simple diagram like this one.

Interestingly, because the rest of the diagram has become strictly rectilinear, the one remaining angled section along the Orange Line looks a bit out of place – I might have just straightened it out to simply form a standard 90-degree angle. The error that Robert points out above – that the angled station labels don’t match the angle of this section of line is impossible to unsee once you’ve noticed it, unfortunately.

Finally, I quite like the hatched treatment of the future extension of the Blue Line – it’s got a very “Washington, DC Metro Map” feel to it, which I think the designers were definitely trying to evoke.

Our final word: Better, but at the cost of an unique and distinctive map design.

Submission – Official Map: Sound Transit Link Northgate Extension Line Map, 2021

comment 1
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Chris Bastian, who says:

In anticipation of this month’s service extension to Northgate [Opening day is October 2! – Cam], Sound Transit is rolling out new maps on the Link rail system. Now tagged as the “1 Line” (Green) in anticipation of the future East Link extension.

Transit Maps says:

I think this our first look at Sound Transit’s new design style in the out in the wild, and it’s a pretty decent effort overall. Style-wise, this is only a very slight evolution from the previous “red line” platform maps, but overall the changes are for the better.

Following best practices, the map now highlights stations in the direction of travel (here, southbound from Mount Baker station), making it very clear where a rider can go from the platform they’re standing on. Station labels are all set slightly bolder than on previous maps, which allows the new “Downtown Seattle” and “UW Campus” labels to be easily differentiated. I’m not crazy about the execution of these new labels, but they get the job done, I guess.

It’s interesting to note that the icon for the highlighted “you are here” station gets enlarged a bit, which pushes the station’s name to the right a bit, no longer aligning vertically with all the other labels. This draws your eye in because it looks subtly different, so it’s actually a very effective little bit of design – look here first!

On the subject of the icons: Seattle is stuck with them for the foreseeable future, but at least they’re looking as good as possible. They used to be constrained inside circles, but they actually look much better and more visually distinct from each other floating free like they are on this map.

The map’s legend is clear and concise, but I have a couple of minor quibbles. I like to group like things together when I make a legend, so it seems a bit jarring to have alternative transportation connections like monorail, Sounder and streetcar broken up by parking (which I’d put last on this list). “Sounder” also isn’t a very meaningful name for those unfamiliar with Seattle – “Sounder commuter rail” would be more descriptive and useful – although that longer label wouldn’t fit into the legend box as neatly!

Of course, as nice as this map is, the real test of this design style will be when East Link opens in 2023 and there’s a new line that doesn’t run neatly north-south. I look forward to seeing how that particular challenge will be tackled!

Our final word: Very solid work, though perhaps an interim solution that will need reworking once Seattle has more than one light rail line.

Source: Photo from Chris, straightened and cleaned up by Transit Maps.

Official Proposed Map: “SEPTA Metro” Map and Wayfinding, 2021

comments 8
Filed Under:
Official Maps

After teasing this for a while now, SEPTA has finally dropped their recommendations for a completely revamped (and long overdue!) rapid rail network map and wayfinding system. And I have to say, I’m cautiously optimistic about things so far.

Note: The image above is a screenshot of an online interactive map that omits the map’s title and legend. The printed map has this information included.

The first and most obvious difference when compared to previous versions (the map has remained largely unchanged since my review way back in 2011 – Cam) is the complete de-emphasis of the regional rail network. It’s been reduced to very thin lines right at the bottom of the information hierarchy, with only select interchange and terminal stations shown. This makes things very clear that this is a map devoted to the new “Metro” branding – rapid rail transit. Hopefully, service can live up this name in reality!

The near-elimination of the regional rail finally allows the subway-surface trolley lines (now designated as “T” for “trolley”) to be depicted with a much higher degree of accuracy, which I find very welcome. Cased lines show which segments are street running or underground, which works well for the “T” lines, though I find it less useful for the other subway lines. It just seems overly fussy, perhaps?

Breaking all the lines down into their service patterns and showing them individually works really, really well and is very intuitive: B1 = Broad Street Local; B2= Broad Street Express; B3 = Broad-Ridge Express… it’s all very clear.

The new colours for some lines will take a bit of getting used to, I’m sure, but it’s a nice vivid palette that works well together. Fuschia for the “D” lines is a welcome change from a green that was only ever-so-slightly different to the trolley lines.

As this map is just a proposal, there’s a few things that do seem less than finished: the shape of the rivers seems a bit rough, for example, and there’s a couple of non-standard angles on roads that really look out of place. I personally don’t think there’s a huge benefit in showing roads that key bus routes don’t run along: they just introduce another layer of information that isn’t that important and compete visually with the bus lines and regional rail. I do think the route numbers for the bus lines are too small and light to be read easily.

Including points of interest is welcome, but there’s only two (plus parks) on the map at the moment – the stadiums and the Museum of Art. Is this enough to warrant the inclusion of this type of information, or should a few more select locations be included?

Similarly, neighborhood designations are always a good thing to include on a diagram of this regional scale, but they all seem a bit small and and indistinct to be quickly readable to me. “North Philly” and “South Philly” also seem a bit informal for a transit map, though I’ll bow to local usage here if that’s what everyone calls them.

The spacing of stations on the D1 could be made a bit more even, and the way that some station names on the D2 have to flip sides to accommodate the Media/Elwyn regional rail line (much lower in the information hierarchy, remember?) is unfortunate.

I would expect that many of these minor problems will be sorted as the design progresses, but really, this is a very promising start. Even better is the implementation of the individual line diagrams, which takes a bunch of disjointed, inconsistent and just plain unattractive maps and turns them into a clear, cohesive suite of modern diagrams that work as part of a larger whole. Just lovely.

Of course, these diagrams don’t stand alone, but are part of a comprehensive wayfinding package that merits a detailed look. Read about the master plan here, and view an interactive version of the system map that explains a lot of the decision-making process here. You can even leave feedback on what you think of the proposed wayfinding.

Our final word: Borne out of a lot of research, this is a brave new start for SEPTA and is to be applauded. It’s not perfect by any means, but I like the direction its headed in.

Submission – Official Map: Bus Network of Leiria, Portugal, 2021

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Tiago, who says:

Here’s the official bus map of Leiria, a small Portuguese city with around 50,000 people living inside its urban perimeter.

In my opinion, this map is a mess and completely useless since I was never able to use it while riding the bus. Although it gives us an idea of the lines, it has too little information and it’s too confusing.

What do you think?

Transit Maps says:

I’m with you, Tiago – this really isn’t very useful at all. Rather than having any sense of scale or how the network physically relates to the geography of the city, it’s just an overly stylised and simplistic overview map. In a way, it comes across more as a decorative illustration than a map – pretty, but not actually functional.

The version on the agency’s website is “interactive” in that each line highlights as you mouse over it (with the others fading down), but even that’s only slightly useful. Clicking on a line takes you to the relevant schedule page, which is nice. However, the schedules themselves are also over-designed and not immediately intuitive… everything is just harder work than it should be.

On the positive side, the icons used to indicate points of interest are generally clear and easily understandable, though I’d like some consistency on the bug bus icon used to indicate interurban bus service… only one of them has an indication of where these buses actually go. Again, really useful stuff to know! The “blobby dot” station tick is an interesting approach I haven’t seen before – it certainly fits with the style of the map.

Our final word: Simple, bright, colorful… and not really very useful. Definitely an example of form over function that can only serve as a very simplistic overview of the network.

Source: Mobilis Leiria website

Project: A Map of Electric Streetcars in Portland, Oregon, 1915

comments 8
Filed Under:
Historical Maps, My Transit Maps, Prints Available

Here’s a map that’s been a long time coming, and one that I think has been worth the wait. I’ve wanted to make a transit map of historical streetcar routes in my adopted home town of Portland, Oregon for at least five years now, but it’s always seemed like a very daunting task. The success of my historical Spokane streetcar map from earlier this year finally gave me the tools I needed to get this map done, and this map is very definitely a deliberate companion piece to it.

You can view the map in the window below, or click here to view it in a full-screen window.

At its height, the Portland Railway Light & Power Company’s city streetcar network had more than 35 routes, plus a few extra stub lines run by independent companies. Finding a way to clearly map these lines in the dense downtown area always seemed impossible to me, and I’ve made many terrible attempts at it over the years. It wasn’t until I made my Spokane map that I realised that I could simply bundle similar routes together into colour-coded trunk lines, which finally gave me the spark that this Portland map needed to work.

A City of Bridges

In Spokane, I grouped lines by the street they left downtown on, but for Portland there was an even better distinguishing feature: the bridges across the Willamette River. Each bridge had its own unique streetcar loop pattern in downtown Portland – for example, cars across the Broadway Bridge would run counter-clockwise on Broadway, Washington Street, Fifth Street (now Fifth Avenue), and Glisan Street, with the nominal “terminus” being at the intersection of Broadway and Washington.

So I simply grouped routes that used the five bridges of the time (three of which still stand today!) – from north to south being the Broadway, Railroad/Steel, (old) Burnside, (old) Morrison and Hawthorne. Remaining lines were then given other colours to denote if they ran along Washington Street on the west side, or if they were were crosstown or stub lines. The few remaining independent lines round out the forty-one (yes, 41!) lines shown on this map. Only one new streetcar line would be constructed after this date: the 1920 Municipal Terminal line from St. Johns to the city-owned docks on the Willamette. I chose to represent 1915 instead of 1920 because I came across a Pittmon Guide map from that year that included a diagram showing exactly how all the downtown loops worked and which lines used them – an invaluable aid that I’d never seen before, reproduced below.

Note: There’s one error in that Vancouver cars physically couldn’t have gone from Second Street to Glisan Street and then over the Railroad Bridge but must have used Flanders Street like the other Railroad Bridge cars, but the rest seems accurate and consistent with all my other research.

Of Streets and Avenues

Street names used on this map reflect the more chaotic Portland of 1915, rather than today’s orderly quadrant-based address system with streets running east-west and avenues running north-south. Many street names were different, there were only 20 numbers per block, and only streets on the east side had a directional modifier before their name (East Burnside, East Glisan, etc.) and then only if there was an equivalent street on the (older) west side – Belmont and Hawthorne didn’t have such a modifier, for example. In the far south-east portion of the city, a completely different system was in use, giving rise to names like 72nd Street S.E. On the west side, Burnside Street ran only from the Willamette to the intersection of 16th Street; further west was actually a continuation of Washington Street.

A Tale of Two Grids

Because of the denser network on the west side of the Willamette, this map uses two distinctly different grids – one that adheres to the city’s underlying numerical grid on the east side, and an enlarged one for the west side that also takes into account the double-width blocks west of 16th Street. The highlighted downtown area only shows streets that tracks run along or are necessary to make certain streets align properly to each other, so it really only gives a general indication of the street grid. I pondered long and hard over labelling streets here, but it just seemed too busy in the end. Your thoughts on this approach would be welcome!

Other Notes

The map also includes the two PRL&P interurban electric lines running to distant destinations like Troutdale, Gresham, Cazadero and Bull Run; the locations of the system’s carbarns and workshops (TriMet still has shops at Center Street, though they serve buses now); as well as city parks that were known to exist in 1915. Not shown are the extensive Oregon Electric and Southern Pacific interurban electric lines to Corvallis, Salem and Eugene, as they just seemed outside the scope of this PRL&P-centric city lines map.

One line to take note of is the Bridge Transfer line, which literally connects all the bridges on the east side of the river. Most sources I’ve seen have it running from the Broadway Bridge along Larrabee and Holladay to Grand Avenue and then south to its terminus at East Lincoln Street. However, I believe that at this time it actually ran south from Holladay along Union Avenue (today’s MLK, Jr. Blvd.) to East Burnside where it jogged across to Grand Avenue. This is how it’s shown on the little sketch maps that appeared in the Pittmon Guide of the time (see below, note the highlighted “B-T” marker along Union Avenue), and making use of existing track that wasn’t in use by any other line at the time (By 1920, the Vancouver line was rerouted over the Burnside Bridge instead of the Steel Bridge and it ran along Union Avenue north of East Burnside).

For the most part, Portland used letter codes on the headboards of their streetcars, and these are reflected on the route name bullets used on the map: even the strange ones like “L” for Mississippi Street cars, “U” for Williams Avenue, or “WR” and “WW” for Richmond and Woodstock cars: the initial “W” stands for “Waverly”, a neighborhood designation that was gradually dropped. Cars up to Council Crest (the most famous Portland streetcar route) were still known as “PH” or “Portland Heights” in 1915; the “CC” or “Council Crest” designation didn’t come into full effect until after World War 2, though it does seem like the terms were partly interchangeable at the time (see the map above which has both PH and CC markers).

Conclusion

The second in a series of maps showing historical streetcar networks of the Pacific Northwest, and a deeply satisfying one to make. Will there be more maps in this series? Only time will tell. I’d love to do Seattle one day – maybe! As always, your thoughts, comments and corrections are welcome below, and prints are available in the Transit Maps store.

Submission – Historical Map: Newcastle Transport Route Map, September 1949

comments 2
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Submitted by Paul, who says:

A map from the Beamish Museum showing the Newcastle upon Tyne tram, trolleybus and bus network in 1949. The trams and trolleys are long gone, but the bus network is still recognisable. I used to take the number 1 through that janky Heaton route in the 2000s.

The choice of sections for the map lookup references seems very of its time too.

Transit Maps says:

A rather splendid map, with every element hand-drawn – including two charming illustrations of double-decker vehicles in the top corners. Interestingly, the main map seems to be presented at a slightly oblique angle almost as if the view was from an aeroplane high above the city. Distances along the north-south axis are somewhat compressed, and everything leans to the left a little. The bridges over the River Tyne are drawn in a way that reinforces this perspective, so the effect is quite convincing.

If you look closely at this copy of the map, you can see that someone has meticulously written in the locations of all the car barns in blue ink – I wonder who owned this map in the past?

And yes, it always amazes me how modern bus routes continue to travel over the exact same route their predecessors did so long ago!

Source: Beamish Museum

Historical Map: Prague Metro Booklet, c. May 1974

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

A charming page introducing the Prague Metro, probably from around May 1974 when the first section of the Metro – Line C from Sokolovská (now Florenc) to Kačerov – opened. A diagram of the planned system takes up the majority of the page, accompanied by illustrations and text explaining how ticketing, barriers and ingress/egress from the stations would work. Altogether rather lovely.

Source: transphoto.org

Submission – Unofficial (But almost official) Map: Integrated map of Mexico City by Pedro Avila

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Pedro, who says:

So… long story short: By the end of 2018, I submitted to Mexico City official transport authority called SEMOVI (Secretary of Mobility) a proposal for the integrated transport map, which did not make it to the end, and here’s why:

  • Time: The government wanted to introduce its “Integrated Mobility” plan within the first 100 days in office and even though my map was almost ready to go, they were already working with another designer whose work was more in line with what they wanted to do: Merge the Metro’s identity with the rest of the capital’s transport systems. (Official map reviewed in April 2019, 2.5 stars)
  • Highly ambitious: Although the map was not designed by Lance Wyman, he did design the “Movilidad Integrada” image and one of the biggest changes that I proposed was to lose his original Metro typeface and create a new one using Frutiger, DIN and Parisine (Paris’ Metro font) as base, but they felt that the change was too risky as “people are used to the Metro font.” This would’ve also taken a lot of time to complete and again, time was running.

While I wasn’t expecting that much resistance in changing the font, I did have a second proposal in case money/time were an issue: adopt Fira Sans as the new typeface. A huge family of 74 fonts (between weights and styles) that exceeded what I was looking for: legibility, weight variation and condensed/compressed versions (whispering “I’d love to be used in a map” at me).

I used Fira Sans to show how much easier the map will be to read with a non-all-capital font, but Mexico’s love for Lance and all his work won this time.

The map you’ve reviewed is actually the Metro version. There’s a second version where the BRT system (Metrobús) is the star (with all the stations) but because of the font, the Metro lines are arranged differently and become a second lighter colored layer in the back.

As you can see, the only thing we agreed on was an integrated map was needed. I went with a head full of ideas (like changing Line B to one single color, for example [Fun fact: nobody there knows why 2 colors are used]) and even though they were like, “yeah you are right about almost everything here” they were not open to change anything as the clock was ticking.

Transit Maps says:

This is a fascinating “what if?” diagram, as it uses a lot of the same symbology and design framework of what became the official map, yet looks almost entirely different. There’s no doubt that Fira Sans is vastly more legible than the distinctive but hard-to-read Tipo Metro, and it’s great to see that most of the labels on this diagram are set horizontally as well. Maybe some more could be horizontal though: the west end of Metro Line 2 looks like it would work pretty easily, for example.

For such a complex network, Pedro has done a great job of getting everything looking clean and tidy, with a nicely expanded central section. Spacing feels even and harmonious throughout, which is always a good indication of how well the design is working for me.

Our final word: In an alternate reality, this is the current diagram in use in Mexico City, and everyone is happy. Nice work, and a real shame that it wasn’t implemented.

See also: Eric Léon’s unofficial map (June 2020)

Submission – Official Map: Stockholm Archipelago Ferry Network Diagram, 2021

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Matias, who says:

Waxholmsbolaget is a big ferry operator in Stockholm, connecting most of the small islands in the Stockholm archipelago. They have recently updated their line map to a very diagrammatic style. The idea is good, to make it easier to find the lines and where you are going, but it massively distorts the network and the omission of geographic features makes it very difficult to orient yourself. What do you think?

Transit Maps says:

I commented briefly on this diagram on Twitter last week, but I’ll record my thoughts here in a little more detail as well.

First off, it looks to me like the design of this diagram has been heavily influenced by the current Stockholm rail network diagram (PDF link), as it uses similar typography, design elements and symbology. The deep blue background colour is a nice touch (and an improvement over the flat grey of the rail diagram), as is the way that the route/timetable numbers are presented on little nautical pennants. Overall, it’s very nicely designed – it has a solid set of design rules that have been applied consistently as well as a comprehensive legend and annotations on the map.

Despite all these positives, I just don’t think the diagram actually really works for trip planning. As Matias says, the massive distortion of the network and the lack of any geographical cues makes it very difficult for a reader to orient themselves. In reality, the network is much taller than it is wide, spread out as it is along Sweden’s eastern coastline, but the diagram is landscape instead of portrait. Any sense of distance or spatial relationship between the different stops is lost completely. There’s also the whole problem of what actually constitutes a “route” in the context of this diagram, but that’s better dealt with in this Reddit thread, which has a similar view of this diagram and its usefulness.

It’s worth noting that the previous map was fully geographical, and I’m not sure that’s the right solution either. It gives a much better idea of how the system physically fits together, but there’s a lot of empty, wasted space as well. Maybe a hybrid simplified map with the more complex areas enlarged somewhat for clarity would be a good compromise?

Our final word: Looks very stylish, but is it actually useful? I’d say not, and I have my doubts about a full “subway diagram” design like this being appropriate for a complex ferry network like this.

Source: Official Waxholmsbolaget site