Submission – Tourists’ Trolleybus Map of Yalta, Crimea by Aleksandr Karavaev and Nikolay Bashkov

March 21, 2019
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps
Tags:

Submitted by Pasha Omelekhin, who has had maps featured on the blog previously.

Transit Maps says:

Somewhat blurring the line between illustration and map, this diagram — created to provide visitors to the city with an overview of transit in the city and how it relates to points of interest — presents the trolleybus lines and the city as an oblique “birds-eye” view from the sea with the mountains rising behind. Printed versions of the map are die cut to the shape of the mountains and sea, which is a rather lovely and unexpected touch.

The attention to detail is quite staggering, with all of the little point of interest icons being drawn in proper perspective according to their location on the map. I’ve often bemoaned icons drawn from conflicting viewpoints on other maps, so this is rather wonderful to see. There’s also a sense of whimsy — the dockside crane on the waterfront is lifting up one of the letters in its label, for example.

The time that it takes the trolleybus to travel between key points is indicated on the map, as well as approximate walking times to points of interest (though the exact route to take is probably left to a more detailed map). Connections to normal bus services that can get to other points of interest are also shown.

If I had one complaint about this map, it’s that the graceful, sweeping route that the trolleybuses are shown as taking bears very little resemblance to the real world. In actuality, the route takes a hard 90-degree turn away from the coast at the stop where route 42 starts and runs along both sides of the canalised Bystra River (northbound on the west bank, southbound on the east bank). While not essential details to show, both the turn and the split route along the river could serve as very important mental wayfinding tools for people unfamiliar with Yalta’s geography — the very people the map is meant to assist. Earlier iterations of the map (see the short video below) showed both of these in various forms, so it’s interesting to see how the design moved away from a more literal interpretation to this more stylistic form.

Our rating: Looks absolutely gorgeous, full of wonderful details and information. However, I feel that the map’s heavily stylised form actually detracts somewhat from its stated mission of assisting tourists. Three stars.

Do check out the map’s project page, however, as it’s full of great information about the process behind the map (in Russian, but Google Translate does a decent job).

Did you enjoy this post? Do you visit Transit Maps regularly? Consider supporting the site with a small monthly donation via Patreon. Your support makes it possible for me to continue bringing you great content!

Become a Patron!

Source: Nicolay Bashkov’s website

Submission – Official Map: Bus and Tram Map of Norrköping, Sweden, 2019

March 15, 2019
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps
Tags:

Submitted by Kristofer, who says:

This is the new official map for the Östgötatrafiken network in Norrköping. Line 2 and 3 is tram, the rest is bus. I like the overall design of the map, but think it is very hard to read the stop names, because of the very thin font on dark background. Also it is a little strange to denote the lines as unidirectional in the legend (e.g., Line 2 From: Fridvalla To: Kvarnberget). And they misspelled the main stop Resecentrum (Transport hub, by the railway station) on the map.

Transit Maps says:

Overall, I’d have to agree with Kristofer’s summary of this map – the labelling (in what looks to be Helvetica Condensed Light) seems a little too small and spindly to be read easily, especially reversed out of the darker background. The misspelling of the network’s main hub station is pretty unforgivable as well (oops!).

I’m not thrilled with the delicate ticked lines for the tram routes, although they do differentiate them from the bus routes, I guess. Again, it just seems very spindly against the dark background – the red Line 2 in particular seems to get lost in the background.

I do think the dark labels for the localities work well, although the labels for Hageby and Rambodal could easily have been set horizontally instead of on an angle. For that matter, the southern terminus of line 119 at Trumpetaregaten could easily be horizontal as well. Being the only angled terminus label on the map really makes it stand out like a sore thumb.

And yes, labelling the routes in the form of “To” to “From” does seem to confuse things a bit. Hopefully, common sense kicks in and everyone realises that the routes go both ways along the line!

Our rating: Striking at first appearance, but much of the text could stand to be a bit larger and bolder. There’s a lot of empty space on the canvas, so some reworking could use that space more effectively. Two-and-a-half stars.

Did you enjoy this post? Do you visit Transit Maps regularly? Consider supporting the site with a small monthly donation via Patreon. Your support makes it possible for me to continue bringing you great content!

Become a Patron!

Source: ÖstgötaTrafiken website

Submission – Official Map: Buses of Paris, France, 2019

March 8, 2019
comments 3
Filed Under:
Official Maps
Tags:

Submitted by my dad (and you wonder where I get my love of maps from?), who says:

You may be interested in the new Paris bus map, showing major changes to be implemented in April.

Transit Maps says:

Thanks, dad! This is certainly an interesting map, as it uses a lot of familiar elements from the Paris Metro map — the Parisine font family, the slightly muted/pastel colour palette and even the general stylised layout of Paris itself — but to considerably less effect.

Part of this is due to the fact that the map is necessarily far more detailed: it has to show over 60 bus routes as well as four of Paris’ tram routes (1, 2, 3a and 3b). While the Metro map is gradually becoming loaded down with more routes as it incorporates tram, RER and Transilien services, it can always treat them more diagrammatically than a bus map can — as there’s always a need to relate bus routes to the labelled roads they travel upon. This means there’s a lot more angles used throughout the map, making it look less unified and neat. In particular, the areas around Gare St-Lazare and Gare de l’Est have a huge amount of routes heading in all directions, making some of them quite difficult to follow. Added to this, the Les Traverses local circulator routes also have to be shown in some detail, jammed in between the other lines where they can fit.

Another part of the problem is the muted colour scheme — it works well enough on the Metro map where similar hues can be kept apart, but the sheer number of routes crossing the city here means that it’s inevitable that similar or identical colours run next to each other in a lot of places, which isn’t ideal. In true rational French style, the bus numbers actually indicate useful information about the route — a number starting with “2” indicates the route begins at Gare St-Lazare, for example (more detail at Wikipedia) — so one wonders whether that could be leveraged into the route colours somehow? The assignment just seems a bit random at the moment.

It’s also not fully explained why some routes get downgraded to have a grey route line instead of a coloured one, but I presume it has something to do with frequency of service?

Our rating: Tries its hardest to look like its more well-known sibling, but the density of required information makes it come off second best. Making a bus map for such a small, dense network like this is a thankless task and the effort is laudable, but it’s not quite working as anything but a general overview for me. Two stars.

Source: Official RATP website

Submission – Photo: MBTA Green Line Strip Map

March 7, 2019
comments 2
Filed Under:
Historical Maps
Tags:

Submitted by Chris Coveney, who says:

Pet MBTA peeve – there is NO reason that angle of the E-line standoff can’t match the D-line on the Green Line strip Map . (Now it will endlessly annoy you too!)

Transit Maps says:

It’s not just the mismatched angles of the branches that makes my eye twitch on this map, Chris. I can’t help but notice that all the stops on the “B” branch that were closed in 2004 have had their names erased, but their station dots remain.

There’s also still a reference to Arborway (closed in 1985) on the “E” branch, although with a subtitle naming Heath Street as the actual terminus. The map itself dates from 1990 or later, as it used to read “Hynes Convention Center/ICA”, so it’s possible that this map was made in the period when the Arborway closure was still thought to be temporary and its use as the name of the branch line was still common.

Still, this is a map well and truly past its use-by date – which seems to be an all too common sight on the MBTA.

Submission – Unofficial Map: Montreal Metro Strip Map by Max Robb

March 5, 2019
comments 2
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps
Tags:

Submitted by Max, who says:

Some time ago you had someone submit a redesign of the Montreal map in the style of Harry Beck (August 2013), but noted it included a number of “un-Beckian” turns at the ends of the green line. Inspired by this, and that Montreal’s system was manageable for a first-time designer, I removed as much of the geography as I felt I could. I picture this being the right sort of map for above the doors of a train car.

The map’s odd angle came about by a bit of an accident, and is likely its greatest flaw, because it crowds out the station names in a number of places, and a steeper angle would likely do less of this.

Transit Maps says:

I think this is an interesting way to depict the system within the confines of a narrow space, Max, and for the most part it works fairly well. Of course, there’s some necessary distortion to make things fit (including “north” being at both ends of the map where the two termini of the Orange Line are), but the indication of the islands helps with orientation somewhat. The twinning of the Green and Orange lines between Lionel-Groux and Berri-UQAM works well, as does the way that the Yellow Line continues along the slope set up by the Green Line – deftly done!

The main problem that I see –and it’s one that Max has already identified himself – is the spacing of the stations, which can shift from being quite cramped, to generous, and back to cramped again along the length of a line. An approach here could be to mark out the longest line – the Orange Line here with 31 stations – into completely even divisions, and then use that measurement as the basis of a grid to align the other stations on the map to. This would definitely help the left end of the Green Line to Angrignon, which seems the most cramped part of the map to me.

After that, look for more simplification and alignment of elements. The right end of the Orange Line could continue up its slope until it is level with the Blue Line and then travel horizontally, for example.

In short, I think this is a good concept that fits a lot of information into a tight space, but it needs some refinement to really make it work. Keep at it!

Submission – Fantasy Map: Rail Map of the Wasatch Front, Utah, 2050 by Christopher Council

March 4, 2019
comment 1
Filed Under:
Fantasy Maps
Tags:

Submitted by Chris, who says:

Here’s a map I’ve done that presents a vision for Wasatch Front rail transit in the year 2050. It’s done in the style of the London Underground map.

Possible future lines are shown with dashes and are based on various proposals throughout the years. Some are very likely to be built fairly soon, while others are not. For instance, some parts of the Wasatch Line (my name) have been proposed, but not in a unified line as I’ve chosen to do.

Transit Maps says:

This is a very competent map that Chris has made, with nice clear labeling and well-spaced stations. The downtown area is particularly well handled, as it always has the potential to look extremely cramped. The colours for the mountains and lakes are well chosen, and successfully don’t look like fare zones, which is nice.

There’s a few places where the labels could be improved a bit: “West Jordan City Center” could be set on two lines, and “Park City Main Street” could be slotted into its natural position to the right of the route line if all the stations below it slid down a bit more. It looks very odd as the only station on that section to be set to the left and above the line.

The pecked lines indicating future additions to the network work well, but I would like to see some mode differentiation between light rail and the FrontRunner commuter rail: they’re very different services in terms of frequency and operating hours and need to be shown as such. Working within the Underground theme, cased lines like the London Overground would seem to be the best choice.

Speaking of the Underground theme… unless a map is meant to be a direct homage to or a deliberate pastiche of that venerable icon, I’d really like to see designers come up with their own design language for their maps. The best transit maps from around the world always have their own unique identity, and I don’t think that you learn as much about what makes a transit map tick when you simply copy the style of such a well-known map. I’d love to see Chris rework this map into something more uniquely “Utahn” – thinking about the font choices, colours, station markers, everything! The framework of the map is very solid, but (for me, at least) the style has been seen and used too many times before.

Submission – Unofficial Map: MARTA Rail, Atlanta Redesign by Alec Southwell

February 28, 2019
comment 1
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps
Tags:

Submitted by Alec, who says:

Long-time reader here with my first submission, a redesign of Atlanta’s MARTA rail system.

I’ve always been puzzled as to why the colors in MARTA’s logo don’t reflect those of the lines. For this map, I’ve “rebranded” the line colors, which has the added benefit of making them easier to distinguish for those with colorblindness. I’ve named the lines after their unique terminals, which erases the potential confusion for tourists or first-time riders of which branch goes where.

Transit Maps says:

There’s a lot to like in Alec’s reworking of Atlanta’s rapid rail transit network — a minimalist look with really nice typography, definitely evoking a very mid-century design feel. There are a few elements that are at odds with that simplicity, like the attempt to show the actual routing of the Atlanta Streetcar and the overly fussy right-angled bends that the northern end of the Orange Line takes past Medical Center. Without having to show the relationship of those stations to Atlanta’s highway network like the official map does, I feel that this whole section could just be straightened out. With a simplified diagram like this that obviously draws influence from his work, it’s good to ask, “What would Massimo Vignelli have done here?” — the answer would almost always be to simplify down to the absolute barest of elements.

I like Alec’s reworking of the line colours, both because it brings them in line with MARTA’s branding (as he notes), but it also makes the service relationships between the pairs of lines more obvious. The two warm colours share a trunk line, as do the two colder colours. If anything, it might be good to swap the orange and yellow line colours, just to give the stronger colour to the line that has service along its full length at all times. The yellow then belongs to the line that gets cut back to serve as a shuttle in the evenings, similar to the treatment of the lighter blue line along the east-west trunk. Finally — as Alec says — the colours do work better for colour-blind users, as seen below in comparison to the official map (left). With only four clearly-labelled lines, this isn’t a huge issue for Atlanta, but it’s nice to see that it’s been a design consideration for Alec.

Alec’s solution to the different service patterns is in line with the minimalist principles of the map (white dot = full time service, white hollow dot = daytime service, white hollow diamond = daytime service on weekdays only), although the diamond is perhaps visually a little too similar to the hollow circle on first glance. A little further exploration of symbols to come up with something more immediately and obviously different could be good.

I’m not entirely sold by Alec’s naming of the lines, which seems potentially confusing to me: an announcement like “This is a Doraville Line train to the Airport” seems almost certain to cause panic among those unfamiliar with the system. Likewise, I think Alec needs to append “I-285” to the label for the framing ring road. Atlanta natives might know what “The Perimeter” is, but tourists and visitors almost certainly don’t! The tiny, spindly white label on a light grey background is also quite difficult to read.

Our rating: A great effort from Alec here – a very clean modernist look that works really well for the most part. Could perhaps be simplified a little further in parts.

Official Map: Subway and Streetcar Map of Toronto, 2019

February 19, 2019
comments 2
Filed Under:
Official Maps
Tags:

Seen on Twitter, and requested by a few readers is this new map from the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) that shows both Toronto’s subway and streetcar networks. It’s a great concept, though perhaps overdue, so how does it stack up?

Overall, it’s really rather good. The larger poster format finally frees the subway part of the map from the compressed confines of the narrow above-the-door strip map, though they will still exist alongside these new maps. So wisely, the map uses the same design language, which is pretty well defined these days.

Some problems continue, like the teeny-tiny accessibility icons crammed into the station dots, and the slightly inconsistent way which the route number bullets are integrated with the station labels, but there’s nothing egregiously wrong. Icons for other non-TTC connecting services (GO, VIA, etc.) add extra detail without jamming more lines into the map: a good balance has been struck, I think.

The streetcar grid is rendered well – I particularly like the way that routes that run along the same part of a street run parallel to each other, becoming a simple frequency indicator for that section: more lines equals more streetcars! The dense grid does mean that labels have to cut across route lines in a number of places, but it’s generally handled deftly.

A very minor complaint is that the legend just seems to float in space a bit without really being aligned to anything – personally, I would have used the baseline of the map’s title to “hang” the legend from.

Our rating: A welcome addition to the TTC’s wayfinding package. A single map showing all rail-based transit is a great idea, and this is solidly executed in a well-honed house style. Three-and-a-half stars.

Source: TTC/Twitter

Unofficial Map: Amsterdam Metro and Rail Map, 2019 by Jaap Knevel

February 11, 2019
comments 4
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps
Tags:

Submitted by Jaap, who says:

I’m a Dutch information designer and design school teacher. I would like to submit my map of the Amsterdam Metro and Train network for your review.

Transit Maps says:

Jaap actually sent me a version of this map quite a while ago, and I’m sorry to say that it’s been languishing in my inbox since then. Which is a bit of a crime, because I think this is an excellent, compact little diagram. By eschewing geography almost entirely (only the IJ is included for orientation and there’s no attempt at all to render Amsterdam’s famous canals), Jaap has been able to condense the network down to just its essential elements.

The Metro lines are clear and bold with clearly labelled stops, and the train lines fit nicely into their supporting role. The underlying grid is solid, and the layout allows the type for the labels to be set nice and big. While no routes or service patterns are indicated on these train lines, a reader can quickly and easily see that there are connections from Schiphol Airport to Amsterdam Centraal Amsterdam Zuid and RAI just by following the route lines. Simple, but effective.

Jaap’s made the interesting decision to change some of the line colours away from the official ones (the M50 switches from green to orange; the M51 from orange to cyan; while the new M52 is purple instead of cyan). In his previous submission, he said that this was to increase contrast between adjacent route lines, which certainly is an issue with the official orange/yellow/red combination of lines out of Amsterdam Centraal. Jaap also notes that “together, the new line colors form a rainbow flag, a reference to Amsterdam’s progressive values and support of gender and sexual diversity”, which is actually a pretty neat little piece of design.

My complaints are very minor – Schiphol is misspelled as “Shiphol”, and the curve on the rail line out of Muiderpoort towards Amsterdam Amstel seems like it’s been cut off a little short when compared to other similar curves on the map.

Our rating: Compact and minimal, this is a superbly legible diagram that doesn’t waste a single bit of space. I’m not entirely sure that designers should normally unilaterally decide to alter official line colours, but Jaap uses his changes to teach a good lesson about using contrasting adjacent colours. Nice work all around!

New Project: New York Subway Map in the Style of the London Underground Map

February 9, 2019
comments 6
Filed Under:
My Transit Maps, Prints Available
Tags:

If you follow me on Twitter, then you know I’ve been working on this project for a while now, but I think the time has finally come to share the final product. (Click on the image to view it larger).

Prints of this map are available in my online store, starting at just $38 plus shipping for a 24″ wide by 32″ print. Click here to get one!

This map is an evolution of one I initially made as a quick throwaway project back in 2016, but lots of great feedback from many, many people has really helped it become much more complete and comprehensive. While my original map only featured the subway itself, this one includes PATH (and parts of New Jersey!), the Staten Island Railway (added after overwhelming popular support), the JFK AirTrain, the Roosevelt Island Tram and indications of easy connections (either directly adjacent stations or those within a 0.3 mile radius) to the Long Island Rail Road, Metro-North Railroad and NJ Transit.

While the map is faithful to the London Underground style, there have been some changes made for a few reasons. All the icons have been redrawn to better match their New York equivalents (check out the Roosevelt Island Tram icon!) and to avoid using any official Transport for London design assets in the map. The typeface is ITC Johnston Sans, a commercially available font for which I hold a license. All the colours have likewise been tweaked to be similar—but not identical—to those used on the Tube Map.

For legibility’s sake, I’ve used a thin white keyline to separate route lines of the same colour when they cross each other but don’t otherwise interact. This mainly happens with branches of the orange IND 6 Avenue line, as seen to the left. The official Tube Map uses keylines like this in a couple of places (but not very consistently), so I thought adapting it for this specific purpose would be fine. It certainly adds a bit of clarity to some potentially confusing areas of the map, as does the addition of a few strategically placed reassurance bullets that help a reader follow the lines from end to end.

More details of the map in the gallery below:

By popular request, prints of this map are available in my store starting at just $38 plus shipping for a 24″ x 32″ print. Because this is a vector file, I can print this one right up to a massive 44″ wide by 58.5″ deep. Go get yourself one!

As always, your comments and thoughts are welcome. This one has been a lot of fun to work on and improve with the assistance of so many wonderful people—thanks again to all of you!

Did you enjoy this post? Do you visit Transit Maps regularly? Consider supporting the site with a small monthly donation via Patreon. Your support makes it possible for me to continue bringing you great content!

Become a Patron!