Official Map: “Draw Your Own” Future SFMTA Transit Map

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Future Maps, Official Maps

Suddenly, it seems that “draw-your-own” subway maps are all the rage. Hot on the heels of Jason Wright’s fun Brand New Subway game comes this slightly more serious planning tool released by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) in conjunction with other local authorities. 

The stated goal of the tool is simple: Where do you want subway transit in SF? Just draw lines on the map where you want ‘em to go, add some stations and hit “Submit”. From there, I’m guessing the SFMTA collates all the responses, eliminates the spurious ones and then looks for common corridors and station locations in those that remain. It’s certainly an interesting way of soliciting initial community input, if nothing else.

It does seem a little odd that the currently under-construction Central Subway isn’t included on the map as a given element, seeing that it’s already part of the future of subway transit in San Francisco, but maybe this way gives users more freedom to express their ideas?

There’s more background information here on the SFMTA blog, or you can just dive in and make a map here.

Submission – Official Map: the Carmelit Underground Funicular, Haifa, Israel

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Adam Susaneck, who says:

My favorite from Israel: the Carmelit. The Carmelit is an underground funicular in Haifa, Israel, which traverses the city’s primary geographic feature, Mt. Carmel. The Carmelit, opened in 1959, is one of the world’s shortest subways at only just over a mile, and is the only subway in Israel. The map shows notable attractions near each stop.

Transit Maps says:

This is a great submission, Adam. It combines two rarities: a fully-underground funicular system and an illustrated map, so it scores double points!

I definitely enjoy the “naive art” illustration style – check out the adorable trains, cranes and ships along the waterfront – but do the names of the actual stations have to be so darn small? Thank goodness for the six giant logos and the secondary list of station names off to the right, without which there’d be an awful lot of squinting going on.

Our rating: A charming illustrated map that suits the touristic nature of the line these days. The minuscule labelling isn’t ideal, but there’s only six stations to remember, so it’s not really a huge problem. Three stars.

Submission – Unofficial Future Map: Connecticut Rail by Nick Fabiani

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Fantasy Maps, Future Maps

Long-time readers might remember Nick’s fantasy Connecticut transit system (April 2015), so it’s nice to see a new “companion piece” from him that reflects the real world situation of the not-too-distant future when the Hartford Line opens in early 2018. 

As most of the rail in Connecticut runs along the chiefly east-west Northeast Corridor, Nick has come up with the rather clever idea of rotating the whole map 30 degrees counter-clockwise, which allows him to place his station labels far more efficiently than if the lines just ran horizontally across the map. The rotated angle also gives a nice dynamic energy to the whole map, which I find quite pleasing.

If it was me, though, I’d nudge all the labels along the main trunk up and to the right just a tad. As it stands, the label for the next station up the line almost sits on the same horizontal axis as the lower station’s dot, which could cause some readers to misinterpret which label belongs to which station, especially in the more crowded parts of the map. It’s certainly nowhere near as bad as the recent terrible Washington DC strip maps, but why take chances?

Nick’s map shows the different Connecticut-serving services efficiently, wisely breaking the New Haven Line into New York up into its separate branches, which has the added benefit of showing how the Waterbury Branch operates (almost entirely) as a shuttle service. His cased “peak service only” line is a little difficult to make out at smaller reproduction sizes: perhaps the central white stroke needs to be just a little thicker? I like the inclusion of connecting CT Fastrack BRT and Amtrak services to complete the “bigger picture”.

Nick’s used the Google Font Roboto for his map, which is nice and clean and has a very “DIN-like” feel to it. It perhaps doesn’t gel that well with the appropriated official CT Rail branding, but Nick seems to indicate that an imaginary rebrand is in the works, so perhaps this is only temporary.

Overall, this is very solid work by Nick, with a good solution to the problem of having the majority of the stations arranged along one axis.

Source: Nick’s project website

Photo: Framed Mini Map and Tickets

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

I’m absolutely loving this framed “mini map” and ticket display by Peter Dovak, whose work we’ve featured here on Transit Maps previously. A neat idea, executed very confidently. Hopefully, his collection can grow to showcase even more maps and tickets in the future!

Source: Peter Dovak/Twitter

Official Map: Montgomery County DOT Metrorail SafeTrack Map for August 9–18, 2016

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

While the purpose is noble – to inform riders of alternative transportation methods while vital trackwork is performed on Metro’s Red Line – this map is a hideous mess. I certainly doubt that Lance Wyman would approve of any of the additions, which look like they’ve been simply slapped on in Word or PowerPoint (the use of the standard Windows typeface Calibri certainly points that direction, anyway). 

The wobbly lime green MARC route line (with no fewer than three MARC logos!) is the most obvious offense, but the “Q” Metro bus routes are also so poorly drawn that an explanatory table of the stations they serve has had to be added. The map also never quite explains what the dashed Red Line between Shady Grove and Twinbrook actually means. By implication, it would seem that this is the section of track that’s closed in this time period, but it never hurts to make this information completely explicit.

However, this map does continue a fine tradition of Maryland agencies doing terrible things to the Metro map.

Source: WTOP website via Raynell Cooper/Twitter

Submission  – Official Map: Unified Rio de Janeiro Olympics Transit Map, 2016

comment 1
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Pedro, who says:

Rio de Janeiro City Hall made a new transit map! It’s the first official map of the city that shows all the options, including the new LRT line and the Olympic-exclusive lines. What do you think about it?

Transit Maps says:

Well, it’s certainly an improvement over the old Metro-only map (May 2012, 2 stars), and it’s always nice to see a map that integrates different transportation modes. Here, I believe the idea is to show all the transport modes that are valid for use with the official Olympics Travel Card, including the brand new Metro Line 4 and special Games BRT services. Note that both Line 4 and the BRT buses require you to have both a travel card and a ticket to an event to board. Interestingly, the map also shows ferry services, which I don’t think are covered by the travel card.

As for the map itself, it’s competent enough without being outstanding. I think a better job could have been done with highlighting important terminal stations for tourists unfamiliar with the city: it’s all very well saying that a BRT runs from Jardim Oceânico to Centro Olímpico, but where are these places on the map? The map covers such a large area that finding these places initially takes quite while. I’d also have liked to see pictograms for the events at each Olympic venue, just to make it clear what’s going on where.

The map works hard to differentiate all the different modes by using different types of lines for each – solid for the Metro, cased for the BRT services, triple-stroke for the new light rail/tram, dashed for the ferries, and an outlined dashed line for the commuter rail. This last one is arguably the least successful – dashed lines like this often signifying “under construction” or “future service” on a transit map – but it is nicely executed, with the dashes always lining up perfectly with station ticks.

The map does feel a little crowded down to the bottom left corner, with a whole bunch of BRT stations jammed in down there. The generous amount of space given to the mainly empty right side of the map could have been better used to left the left side breathe a little.

There are a couple of little oddities: a non-standard angle at the end of the Santa Cruz train line, and the weird decision to have the Circular Service Honório – Deodoro line run across the other lines to hit the centre of the Deodoro station marker: it would have looked much neater if it just ran up the right side to join a wider marker.

Our rating: Pretty solid work, although I think it could take too long for tourists (the main demographic for this map) to work things out on their first use of the map. A legend to important stations and venues could really have helped in that regard. Three stars!

Source: Rio Cidade Olympíca website – link no longer active now that the Games are over

“Brand New Subway” – a New York Subway-Building Game by Jason Wright

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Miscellany

You weren’t doing anything productive today, were you? Because this neat online game has the potential to waste hours – or even days – of your life as you attempt to build the perfect subway system. Tweak the existing system to make it just so, or start from scratch and build your own dream network. The game will rate you on estimated ridership and per-ride cost, as compared against the baseline of the current system. 

There’s some serious numbers under the hood of this game – census and employment data, existing transportation demand and so on – but Jason points out that the simulation is meant to be a bit of fun and not taken too seriously as a planning tool. But what are you waiting for? Go and get started by clicking here! I’m certainly going to take it for a serious spin when I have some spare time.

(Also, read Jason’s summary of the project – lots of great background info!)

“Direction Angrignon” by Nicolas Kruchten

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Visualizations

I’m somewhat in awe of this project by Nicolas Kruchten, which shows full-length panoramic views of all the Angrignon-bound platforms on the Montreal Metro’s Green Line. To achieve the end result, Nicolas took video from the last window of a train as it departed each station, and then wrote software that stitched frames together into the final panorama, taking into account the train’s acceleration out of each station. Astounding!

Nicolas is toying with the idea of releasing posters of this project, so if you’re interested, head on over to his project page and let him know!

Project: Streetcars and Electric Railways in Portland, 1920

comments 17
Filed Under:
Historical Maps, My Transit Maps

It’s safe to say that I’m fascinated with the rich transit history of my adopted hometown of Portland, Oregon, and it’s certainly something that I’ve explored before in a previous project. This new project started out with a very simple goal – to produce a route map of Portland streetcars at their zenith in 1920 that showed each line separately – but it quickly grew into something much more.

As I worked on my initial map, it quickly became apparent to me that information about the streetcars back then was imprecise, fractured and difficult to find. Books like John Labbe’s Fares, Please! Those Portland Trolley Years and Richard Thompson’s series of books about the history of Portland’s streetcars helped to fill in a lot of the gaps, but they were designed more as historical and photographic records than a technical summary of routings. Information found on the internet was often incomplete, like this list of streetcar lines. For someone trying to piece together how the downtown trolley loops worked, it was a very frustrating time, with lots of cross-referencing required.

So while I did complete a designed map of the lines (as shown here), I also started compiling my findings into an interactive Google Map, accurately plotting each line as it existed in 1920, paying attention to where each line used a private right-of-way, and noting that the streetcars would have used the old Morrison Bridge, which actually connected to Morrison Street on the west side.  I added notes on where track, evidence of rights-of-way and other infrastructure related to the system could still be found today, as well as historical photos and notes for things long gone.

Once I finished plotting the streetcar network, I expanded the scope of the map to include all electric passenger rail out of Portland in 1920: trolleys to Troutdale, Oregon City, Bull Run and Cazadero; and interurban electric trains running down the Willamette Valley as far as Corvallis, Albany and Eugene. This year was the absolute peak of electrical rail traction; by the end of the decade both the streetcars and the interurbans would already be in serious decline.

Multiple sources were used to compile this part of the map, including historical USGS topographical maps of Oregon, numerous maps and pages from the internet, and even Google Maps itself. I found that if you zoom in close enough, Google shows tax lots, which often still include the otherwise-invisible right-of-way of long-abandoned rail lines.

Some of the old lines still exist much as they did back in 1920,  while others have been repurposed as modern passenger rail – TriMet’s MAX Blue Line runs on old electric railway alignments on both the west and east sides, as does the WES commuter rail. The old Springwater and Cazadero Divisions now form a walking trail that can take you from inner Portland almost out to Estacada. However, some lines have long since been abandoned, with only those tax lot boundaries or a road that was laid down directly over the old tracks to tell you of its previous existence.

After all that work, I’m proud to announce that the map can be viewed below, or you can click here to view it full-screen.

It’s still very much a work in progress – I’ll add any corrections to it as I find them, and will continue to add historical information and photographs to the map as well – but I’m already very happy that I’ve created something that consolidates so many different and varied informational sources into one place. I’m certainly going to find it useful going forward, and I hope others will as well. I’d love to hear your thoughts about the map in the comments below!

New Project/Work-in-Progress – Historical Map: Streetcar Lines of Portland, Oregon, 1920

comments 2
Filed Under:
Historical Maps, My Transit Maps

Despite Portland once having one of the largest streetcar networks in the United States, finding reliable, empirical information about it is surprisingly difficult. Books about the history of the streetcar – like Richard Thompson’s series of books or John Labbe’s Fares Please! – tend to be more photographs and captions than exhaustive detail, internet sources are incomplete and at times contradictory, and even contemporaneous sources are frustratingly incorrect. A much-referenced Pittmon map of streetcar lines was not updated at all from c.1913 to the late 1920s, but was just republished year after year with references to long-closed or merged routes. 

However, by combining all of these sources, I think I’ve managed to produce a mostly accurate map of streetcar lines in Portland in 1920 – the year the system reached its maximum extent with the addition of the City’s Municipal Terminal Line in St. Johns. 

I say mostly accurate, because I’m almost certain that some of my downtown routing is wrong: working out all the loops and terminus locations is a thankless task. My next step is going to be to create individual line maps for each route, which will hopefully help refine and correct this map. After that, a modern styled transit map of the network is on the cards, and even a chronological series of maps is a possibility.

At this time, there were a staggering 38 streetcar lines running in the city of Portland. Most were run by the Portland Railway, Light and Power Company (or PRL&P, a direct predecessor to today’s PGE), though a few lines were operated by other companies – the Kenton Traction Company’s stockyard line, the City-run Municipal Terminal line, and the free-to-ride Errol Heights stub line, owned by the eponymous Errol Heights Railway Company. In addition to this were some connecting streetcar lines at the city limits, interurban electric trains that could take you as far afield as McMinnville, Salem, Eugene and Corvallis, and mainline steam trains connecting to the rest of the country.

This map is really just my preliminary working map, but it looks pretty nifty, so I thought I’d share. The blue colour used for route lines is set to multiply, so the darker the blue, the more routes are running along a section. The downtown Alder loop out over the Hawthorne Bridge was certainly busy! I’ve substituted a grey for blue for short stub lines and crosstown lines – those that either run only on the east side like the Bridge Transfer (BT) and Russell–Shaver (RS) lines, or that run through the city like the North and South (NS) Portland line. Most of the letter designations were in use at the time on the streetcars themselves, although I’ve had to invent my own in a couple of cases to make the map consistent. The Richmond (RM) and Woodstock (WS) lines were sometimes referred to as Waverley–Richmond (WR) and Waverley–Woodstock (WW), but my usage seems to be correct for 1920 from what I’ve seen.

If you have any thought or corrections, use the contact form on the site. If you want to correspond, please don’t use the “Anonymous” feature so that I can get your email address.

UPDATE 7/25: First round of corrections to the map! Fixed the downtown routing of the Alberta line, which I’d erroneously placed on 5th and 3rd instead of 3rd and 2nd. Reversed the jog at the eastern end of the Beaumont line to properly indicate that the line moves westward from E. 42nd to E. 41st as it reaches The Alameda. All references to the Vancouver line now correctly use “VC” as the abbreviation – thanks to those who pointed this mistake out! 

Finally, after a lot of research, I’ve downgraded the United Railways line that ran through NW Portland to the city limits to an electric interurban instead of a streetcar. The line originally ran from the North Bank Depot in Portland (the buildings of which still remain today as fancy condos) all the way to Wilkesboro and Banks via Linnton and the Cornelius Pass. In 1914, United Railways requested that the fare for the trip from Portland to Linnton be increased from 5 cents to 10 cents. The Oregon Commission granted the increase, but the Multnomah County Court then determined that such an increase was in breach of the terms of the franchise, which specified 5 cents as the maximum fare. As punishment, United Railways was ordered to tear up their track from the Portland city boundary all the way to Linnton, leaving two disconnected sections of the line: Banks to Linnton, and the short remaining line within Portland itself, as shown on this map. Passengers were now forced to use a Spokane, Portland and Seattle (SP&S) steam train to make a connection between the two sections. Unsurprisingly, ridership dropped drastically and electric service on the Banks section of the line ceased in 1923. A fascinating slice of railroad history!

UPDATE 7/28: A few more little edits. Added the route disc for the 13th Street line. Redrew the Mississippi Avenue line to more accurately show the jog between Mississippi and Albina north of Skidmore. Redrew the end of the Errol Heights line to reflect the actual trajectory of Andover (now Flavel). Added the loop at the end of The Oaks line to show how those trains returned to downtown. The Mount Hood Railway is now correctly shown as an electric line, not a steam line. Added railway ownership notes to all the lines leaving the map.