Historical Map: “Futuroute” Route Selector for Picc-Vic Rail Project, Manchester, 1970s

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Everything about this rather fabulous mechanical route selector – a unique piece created to build interest and publicity for the eventually-cancelled rail project – just screams early 1970s modernist design. From the gaudily coloured stripes on the case, to the tightly-spaced sans serif typeface, to the very name itself: “Futuroute” – literally the route for the future! Although I keep wanting to pronounce it as “futuro-route” rather than the intended “futu-route” for some reason…

The unit is now part of the permanent collection at the Museum of Transport, Greater Manchester, and is apparently every bit as clunky to operate as it looks.

For more information on the Picc-Vic project, check out the Wikipedia entry, or Chapter 3 of the Infra_Manc exhibition catalogue (PDF).

Source: Tim Dunn/Twitter

Historical Map: New York City IND Subway Planning Map, 1927

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Via: hyperrealcartography:

New York City IND Subway planning map from 1927.

I don’t have any information about this map other than what’s on it but it appears to be an early version of the Independent Subway System which was built by the City of New York to force the existing private subway companies to sell their lines to the city (”recaptured” as is labeled on the key) .  The plan clearly shows the first section of the 8th Ave Subway, the A/C/E trains, but the 6th Ave Subway, Queens Blvd Subway, Concourse Subway, Crosstown Subway, South Brooklyn Subway and the Fulton St (Brooklyn) Subway are shown only as “Projected”.  

What’s most interesting about this map is that it shows alternative routes for the Brooklyn and Queens lines; the Queens Blvd Line does in fact split under Northern Blvd but there is a plan here to have the express and local tracks split once again along 69th St.  While no explanation is given I can only asume this had to do with the proposed Windfield Spur, a local branch of the Queens Blvd Line which was to zig zag through Maspeth and Middle Village beforeheading to Rockaway Park.  A station and tunnel provisions were built at Roosevelt Ave station for this line so this original alignment could have been related.

The South Brooklyn Line, the F/G trains, shows that it was originally going to run as a straight shot from 7th Ave in Park Slope to Prospect Ave in Windsor Terrace.  This would have dove under Prospect Park and private property until it reached Prospect Ave.  The IND planners (wisely) added a station at 15th St-Prospect Park which required bending the local tracks off from the express tracks which do make the direct path under Prospect Park but are rarely used.

The Crosstown Line, G train, has the most interesting path as it seems planners had not yet found a suitable route south of Broadway.  The path appears to be a straight shot down to Fulton St and, even more puzzling, appears to terminate around Clinton Ave.  Early proposals for a crosstown line by the BMT would have connected it to the Franklin Ave Shuttle and extended service to Brighton Beach; however this line was to be built as an elevated line which residents and business owners along the route opposed.  It was not until the city stepped in with their own subway was a crosstown line reimagined as a subway.  The Crosstown Line was eventually built along Marcy Ave, turning west under Lafayette St to connect with the Fulton Line at Hoyt-Schermerhorn station.

The Concourse Line, the B/D trains, appears to terminate at Bedford Park Blvd (where the local trains do currently).  The right turn the D train makes was added later as a provision for a future extension to Burke Ave and Eastchester which was never finished.

Lastly the Fulton St Line, the A/C in Brooklyn, is only planned until Broadway Junction.  It would seem that planners had not yet decided a suitable route past Broadway Junction at the time.  Given that there were two elevated lines headed into Queens they would have still been determining which one made sense to replace.  Eventually it was decided to continue the line under Pitkin Ave (with further plans to extend lines to Rockaway and Cambria Heights).  At Grant Av the subway rose to connect with the end of the Fulton St elevated line.  But another alternative exists where the Jamaica Line could have connected to the Fulton St Subway.  Bell mouth portals were built just past Broadway Junction station in the tunnels should it ever be decided to reroute the J train along Fulton St.

Planners didn’t stop tinkering with their new subway because in just two years they had devised an even grander scheme; what they were building would only be phase one of a two phase plan, what has famously been remembered as the Second System where new lines like the 2nd Ave Subway and Utica Ave Subway were formally proposed.

Not really a lot to add after such a detailed summary…

Source: spicker613/Flickr

Official Map: “Draw Your Own” Future SFMTA Transit Map

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Future Maps, Official Maps

Suddenly, it seems that “draw-your-own” subway maps are all the rage. Hot on the heels of Jason Wright’s fun Brand New Subway game comes this slightly more serious planning tool released by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) in conjunction with other local authorities. 

The stated goal of the tool is simple: Where do you want subway transit in SF? Just draw lines on the map where you want ‘em to go, add some stations and hit “Submit”. From there, I’m guessing the SFMTA collates all the responses, eliminates the spurious ones and then looks for common corridors and station locations in those that remain. It’s certainly an interesting way of soliciting initial community input, if nothing else.

It does seem a little odd that the currently under-construction Central Subway isn’t included on the map as a given element, seeing that it’s already part of the future of subway transit in San Francisco, but maybe this way gives users more freedom to express their ideas?

There’s more background information here on the SFMTA blog, or you can just dive in and make a map here.

Submission – Official Map: the Carmelit Underground Funicular, Haifa, Israel

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Adam Susaneck, who says:

My favorite from Israel: the Carmelit. The Carmelit is an underground funicular in Haifa, Israel, which traverses the city’s primary geographic feature, Mt. Carmel. The Carmelit, opened in 1959, is one of the world’s shortest subways at only just over a mile, and is the only subway in Israel. The map shows notable attractions near each stop.

Transit Maps says:

This is a great submission, Adam. It combines two rarities: a fully-underground funicular system and an illustrated map, so it scores double points!

I definitely enjoy the “naive art” illustration style – check out the adorable trains, cranes and ships along the waterfront – but do the names of the actual stations have to be so darn small? Thank goodness for the six giant logos and the secondary list of station names off to the right, without which there’d be an awful lot of squinting going on.

Our rating: A charming illustrated map that suits the touristic nature of the line these days. The minuscule labelling isn’t ideal, but there’s only six stations to remember, so it’s not really a huge problem. Three stars.

Submission – Unofficial Future Map: Connecticut Rail by Nick Fabiani

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Fantasy Maps, Future Maps

Long-time readers might remember Nick’s fantasy Connecticut transit system (April 2015), so it’s nice to see a new “companion piece” from him that reflects the real world situation of the not-too-distant future when the Hartford Line opens in early 2018. 

As most of the rail in Connecticut runs along the chiefly east-west Northeast Corridor, Nick has come up with the rather clever idea of rotating the whole map 30 degrees counter-clockwise, which allows him to place his station labels far more efficiently than if the lines just ran horizontally across the map. The rotated angle also gives a nice dynamic energy to the whole map, which I find quite pleasing.

If it was me, though, I’d nudge all the labels along the main trunk up and to the right just a tad. As it stands, the label for the next station up the line almost sits on the same horizontal axis as the lower station’s dot, which could cause some readers to misinterpret which label belongs to which station, especially in the more crowded parts of the map. It’s certainly nowhere near as bad as the recent terrible Washington DC strip maps, but why take chances?

Nick’s map shows the different Connecticut-serving services efficiently, wisely breaking the New Haven Line into New York up into its separate branches, which has the added benefit of showing how the Waterbury Branch operates (almost entirely) as a shuttle service. His cased “peak service only” line is a little difficult to make out at smaller reproduction sizes: perhaps the central white stroke needs to be just a little thicker? I like the inclusion of connecting CT Fastrack BRT and Amtrak services to complete the “bigger picture”.

Nick’s used the Google Font Roboto for his map, which is nice and clean and has a very “DIN-like” feel to it. It perhaps doesn’t gel that well with the appropriated official CT Rail branding, but Nick seems to indicate that an imaginary rebrand is in the works, so perhaps this is only temporary.

Overall, this is very solid work by Nick, with a good solution to the problem of having the majority of the stations arranged along one axis.

Source: Nick’s project website

Photo: Framed Mini Map and Tickets

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

I’m absolutely loving this framed “mini map” and ticket display by Peter Dovak, whose work we’ve featured here on Transit Maps previously. A neat idea, executed very confidently. Hopefully, his collection can grow to showcase even more maps and tickets in the future!

Source: Peter Dovak/Twitter

Official Map: Montgomery County DOT Metrorail SafeTrack Map for August 9–18, 2016

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

While the purpose is noble – to inform riders of alternative transportation methods while vital trackwork is performed on Metro’s Red Line – this map is a hideous mess. I certainly doubt that Lance Wyman would approve of any of the additions, which look like they’ve been simply slapped on in Word or PowerPoint (the use of the standard Windows typeface Calibri certainly points that direction, anyway). 

The wobbly lime green MARC route line (with no fewer than three MARC logos!) is the most obvious offense, but the “Q” Metro bus routes are also so poorly drawn that an explanatory table of the stations they serve has had to be added. The map also never quite explains what the dashed Red Line between Shady Grove and Twinbrook actually means. By implication, it would seem that this is the section of track that’s closed in this time period, but it never hurts to make this information completely explicit.

However, this map does continue a fine tradition of Maryland agencies doing terrible things to the Metro map.

Source: WTOP website via Raynell Cooper/Twitter

Submission  – Official Map: Unified Rio de Janeiro Olympics Transit Map, 2016

comment 1
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Pedro, who says:

Rio de Janeiro City Hall made a new transit map! It’s the first official map of the city that shows all the options, including the new LRT line and the Olympic-exclusive lines. What do you think about it?

Transit Maps says:

Well, it’s certainly an improvement over the old Metro-only map (May 2012, 2 stars), and it’s always nice to see a map that integrates different transportation modes. Here, I believe the idea is to show all the transport modes that are valid for use with the official Olympics Travel Card, including the brand new Metro Line 4 and special Games BRT services. Note that both Line 4 and the BRT buses require you to have both a travel card and a ticket to an event to board. Interestingly, the map also shows ferry services, which I don’t think are covered by the travel card.

As for the map itself, it’s competent enough without being outstanding. I think a better job could have been done with highlighting important terminal stations for tourists unfamiliar with the city: it’s all very well saying that a BRT runs from Jardim Oceânico to Centro Olímpico, but where are these places on the map? The map covers such a large area that finding these places initially takes quite while. I’d also have liked to see pictograms for the events at each Olympic venue, just to make it clear what’s going on where.

The map works hard to differentiate all the different modes by using different types of lines for each – solid for the Metro, cased for the BRT services, triple-stroke for the new light rail/tram, dashed for the ferries, and an outlined dashed line for the commuter rail. This last one is arguably the least successful – dashed lines like this often signifying “under construction” or “future service” on a transit map – but it is nicely executed, with the dashes always lining up perfectly with station ticks.

The map does feel a little crowded down to the bottom left corner, with a whole bunch of BRT stations jammed in down there. The generous amount of space given to the mainly empty right side of the map could have been better used to left the left side breathe a little.

There are a couple of little oddities: a non-standard angle at the end of the Santa Cruz train line, and the weird decision to have the Circular Service Honório – Deodoro line run across the other lines to hit the centre of the Deodoro station marker: it would have looked much neater if it just ran up the right side to join a wider marker.

Our rating: Pretty solid work, although I think it could take too long for tourists (the main demographic for this map) to work things out on their first use of the map. A legend to important stations and venues could really have helped in that regard. Three stars!

Source: Rio Cidade Olympíca website – link no longer active now that the Games are over

“Brand New Subway” – a New York Subway-Building Game by Jason Wright

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Miscellany

You weren’t doing anything productive today, were you? Because this neat online game has the potential to waste hours – or even days – of your life as you attempt to build the perfect subway system. Tweak the existing system to make it just so, or start from scratch and build your own dream network. The game will rate you on estimated ridership and per-ride cost, as compared against the baseline of the current system. 

There’s some serious numbers under the hood of this game – census and employment data, existing transportation demand and so on – but Jason points out that the simulation is meant to be a bit of fun and not taken too seriously as a planning tool. But what are you waiting for? Go and get started by clicking here! I’m certainly going to take it for a serious spin when I have some spare time.

(Also, read Jason’s summary of the project – lots of great background info!)

“Direction Angrignon” by Nicolas Kruchten

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Visualizations

I’m somewhat in awe of this project by Nicolas Kruchten, which shows full-length panoramic views of all the Angrignon-bound platforms on the Montreal Metro’s Green Line. To achieve the end result, Nicolas took video from the last window of a train as it departed each station, and then wrote software that stitched frames together into the final panorama, taking into account the train’s acceleration out of each station. Astounding!

Nicolas is toying with the idea of releasing posters of this project, so if you’re interested, head on over to his project page and let him know!