Submission – Unofficial Map: Passenger Rail Services of Wales by James Jackson

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Submitted by James, who says:

While I’ve been designing imaginary transit maps, and re-imagining existing transit maps, for a few years, I’ve been doing it on Illustrator. I’ve drawn the Welsh rail franchise a number of times, but I set myself a few challenges this time round.

  1. I wanted to make it clearly bilingual. Here in Wales we’re used to seeking out our respective languages on signs and official documents, but official versions of the map often use a coloured, and slightly lighter shade for the Welsh variants. There is some merit in this when you are trying to squeeze everything into a cramped layout, but if you space your information correctly I see no reason why this should be necessary.
  2. Unlike my previous versions, I wanted to be able to give a clear indication of the normal routes that trains take. There are clear flows. In the Cardiff area, trains from Merthyr go to Barry, trains from Rhymney go to Penarth. At Wrexham General the hourly service to Holyhead comes from Birmingham and Cardiff on alternate hours, and so on. Adding in lines has forced each individual stroke to go smaller. I have used a ‘white blob’ indicator for station stops.
  3. I wanted the map to be clearly legible when printed as small as A3. For the vast majority of type I employed the DIN Condensed typeface. It renders clearly but gives enough room for the bilingual text. The only place where I failed to keep this at 8pt type was at Energlyn, a new station on the Rhymney line which already has a great many stops. I’ve tried to handle it elegantly, though I doubt everyone will be convinced!
  4. Finally, and to explain my first paragraph, I wanted to use this map to try out Affinity Designer. I’ve been fairly impressed: this could emerge as a serious contender to Illustrator in time. It has most of the basic tools already, and although the interface can be clunky at times and some tools definitely need work, it has very capably produced a result which could definitely rival the official maps.

Nonetheless this work could do with some further refinement. I’m not quite convinced by the joined white dots at major interchanges like Cardiff, the placement of which I have played around with many times. DIN Alternate is also not the most beautiful typeface for the large fonts, though it does resonate clearly with DIN Condensed.

I’d be grateful for an overall critique, and any positive suggestions regarding improvements. 

NB. The original output is obviously a PDF with a nominal page size of A3, but I have rendered it as a PNG for uploading. I’ve also been doing this on a Retina iMac, and it’s a pleasure to look at text and line art!


Transit Maps says:

Overall, this is a very attractive and well-conceived diagrammatic map. It is a little bit of a shame that the landscape A3 format squashes Wales vertically so much, but the neat organization of the map – with well-defined operating regions and strong visual axes – counteracts that somewhat. I especially like how the Valleys and Cardiff commuter rail lines at the bottom of the map are arrayed in a neat shape surrounding Cardiff, which are then further delineated by the “loop” line from Swansea back to Shrewsbury. The vertical compression does lead to some stations on north/south routes being placed very close to each other, which leads to some uneven-looking station spacing across the map, but everything is still nice and easy to follow. 

Like James himself, I’m not entirely enamoured of the diagonal placement of the station dots at some of the major interchanges like Cardiff. It doesn’t occur often enough in the map to be a repeating design motif, so it looks a little out of place when it does show up.

The bilingual labels on a completely even footing work quite nicely across the whole map, even when James has to deal with the ridiculous Victorian folly of a name at Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch station on Anglesey (a made up name to impress tourists – I’ve been there and I wasn’t that impressed). I think his smaller type at Energlyn is a fair compromise given the space restrictions there, and is actually quite reminiscent of the “subtitle” approach to long station names that’s now used on the Washington Metro.

Apart from these comments, I’d probably also change the end of the red route line at the bottom right of the map into an arrow pointing towards London Paddington, rather than have it appear as a station apparently minutes across the Welsh border.

Our rating: A competently drawn and nicely abstracted diagrammatic map. Perhaps a little too squished from north to south as a result of paper size restrictions. Three stars.

Side note: James’ use of Affinity Designer – a newcomer to the Mac OS X vector illustration game – is definitely worthy of note. As seen from this map, it can produce excellent results, and the interface certainly seems to be more polished than the open-source Inkscape. With a price tag of just $50 for a license (not a subscription), it could be an ideal starting point for those Mac users wanting to get into transit map design, but who can’t afford Adobe Illustrator. For comparison, $50 buys you around 2.5 months of an Illustrator-only Creative Cloud subscription, or just one month of a complete CC subscription.

Photo: Trader Joe’s/MBTA Map

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Miscellany, Unofficial Maps

“This Red Line train is bound for Chard of Many Colors via Black Beans”.

Taken at the Trader Joe’s West Newton store… mostly recognisable as the MBTA “T” map, but with a few additions and exclusions. The Silver Line is now a light shade of blue and promises wild salmon, while the commuter rail lines now seem to sprout randomly from the end of “T” lines in a variety of different colours. Nice hand lettering, though!

Side note: “Heart Healthy Whole Grain Cranberry Oatmeal” is still a shorter station name than “U Street/African-American Civil War Memorial/Cardozo” from the Washington Metro. 

Source: Alisa Zomer/Twitter

Reader Question: Do you know or have a good detailed transit map of Germany’s ICE/IC/RE/etc. services?

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Questions

Question: Hi Cameron, Do you know or have a good detailed transit map of Germany’s ICE/IC/RE/etc. services? I’ve Googled for it and either I’m not using the right words or I need to be using German terminology for it as what I find is lacking. Thanks!


Answer: There are maps of current ICE and IC services available on the Deutsche Bahn website, but they’re pretty terrible (although they do give you an overview of where the trains go, I guess). Below that “intercity” level of service, there are also maps on that page that break Germany down into more manageable regions, showing the trains that operate within each area.

To be honest, for rail travel within Germany, I tend to forego a map altogether and just use the awesome search page on the Deutsche Bahn site. Just plug in the cities you want to travel between, the dates and any other parameters you need. It’ll return your options, including a complete station stopping list and a rough little map for each option. Bonus: it actually covers all of Europe, not just Germany, so you can use it to plan trips through other countries as well.

If anyone knows of some better maps of passenger rail services in Germany, let me know!

Google Doodle Celebrating 80 Years of the Moscow Metro

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Miscellany, Popular Culture

Sent my way by Dmitry Darsavilidze, here’s the Google Doodle that’s currently active in Russia (and Kazakhstan) for May 15th – the 80th anniversary of the opening of the Moscow Metro.

Source: The Google Doodle archive

MTA’s response to better inclusion of PATH on the subway map: thanks, but no.

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Following on from yesterday’s post about the campaign to accord PATH services equal footing with the subway lines on the MTA subway map, The Gothamist received this response from MTA representative Adam Lisberg (who’s actually really cool, and you should follow him on Twitter):

Showing other regional services like PATH in greater detail is a good use for a regional transit map, similar to the one put together for the Super Bowl. However, our map is a subway map, and its primary purpose is to serve as a guide to the subway system. We put a lot of thought into how to reduce the visual distractions and clutter on the map—we don’t even show our own railroads in much detail—but this proposal would add to those non-subway distractions.

We already show PATH where it meets the subway system, although without seeming to imply nonexistent free transfers at the Sixth Avenue stations, and making PATH more prominent would require shrinking the subway portion of the map slightly to accommodate more of the New Jersey waterfront on the same size paper.

That’s a pretty emphatic “no” in my book. Adam makes some good points – the representation of the 6th Avenue PATH stations would need some work to make clear that transfers to/from PATH are paid, not free – but it does seem like very insular thinking to me. Adam notes that the role of the map is to “serve as a guide to the subway system,” and that’s true… but I would like to expand that role to say: “serve as a guide to using rapid transit in the Greater New York area”. Despite state boundaries, the influence of New York doesn’t just suddenly stop at the Hudson River.

Source: The Gothamist

Submission – Unofficial Map: Subway NY/NJ by Stewart Mader

comment 1
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps


A compelling proposal to enhance the representation of “New York’s second subway” – the PATH to New Jersey – on the official MTA subway map. PATH carries over 70 million passengers each year, runs 24 hours a day and even accepts pay-per-ride MTA MetroCards as fare payment, but is relegated to the official map’s subsidiary “commuter/passenger rail track” graphical style, while the New Jersey shoreline itself is completely absent (the Hudson River instead looks particularly wide at that point).

I personally think that this is a simple but incredibly awesome amendment to the New York subway map that provides useful information to the end user – which is what a transit map should be about, right?

Read the full proposal here.

Photo: Willesden Junction, Not Willesden Green!

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

A very obvious sticker hides a rather monumental error on this Bakerloo Line strip map. The rather ugly abbreviation “Junct” only just covers up the fact that this sign used to read “Willesden Green” – which is on the Jubilee Line, not the Bakerloo! Prior to 1979 and the opening of the Jubilee Line, Willesden Green was serviced by Bakerloo trains – but we can’t even blame an old sign here, as this one only dates from the introduction of the Overground brand in 2007 at the absolute earliest. Whoops!

Source: Charlotte Gunnell/Flickr

Submission – Official Map: Municipal Bus Network, Luxembourg City

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by Line Gustafsson, who calls this “Luxembourg City’s spaghetti monster”, and says:

I hate it, the layering of lines is seemingly arbitrary. The bad network design is worsened by choosing very broad lines and thus creating the body of the monster in the centre of the map.

Transit Maps says:

It’s hard to disagree with Line’s nickname for this map, or his frank assessment of it. This is a bit of a mess, especially in the central part where all 27 routes seem to converge without much thought as to how to arrange them efficiently along the central spine. As Line says, the layering of the route lines is pretty random, with lines weaving over and under each other all over the place. This doesn’t make the route lines easy to follow, nor does the fact that there’s no separation between any of the lines: they just all butt right up to each other.

There’s no geography on the map at all, just the names of districts within the city. This wouldn’t present a problem for locals (the city is only 6 miles across at its widest points with a total area of just 20 square miles), but I certainly wouldn’t find this much help as a visitor! Maps like this one just reinforce my belief that bus maps need to be presented within some sort of geographical context – it can be stylised, but bus networks need to be presented in context with their surroundings.

The typography on the map is also pretty disappointing: the title of the map at the top left within the branding shell uses a lovely, friendly and distinctive DIN Rounded font… which doesn’t appear on the map at all. Instead, we get generic standard Windows fonts: Arial, Calibri and Trebuchet. Disappointing.

Our rating: Using another metaphor, it’s like a pile of worms on a page, all twisted around each other. Offers little clarification of a dense network. One star.

See also: Jug Cerovic’s awesome redesign of this map.

Source: Ville de Luxembourg website (link no longer active)

Systems of the Human Body in Schematic/Transit Map Form

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Mash-Up Maps, Visualizations

Depicting the complex networks of the human body in schematic form makes a lot of sense, and designers have been doing it for a while – as the first diagram above shows. Originally created by German medical illustrator Eduard Weber c. 1960, it’s one of a series of six schematic diagrams that depict the neurovascular systems of the human body. These diagrams are widely regarded as a iconic piece of medical design, and even newer editions of the six-sheet book can command high prices (249 euro for a used copy on German Amazon!).

The transit map metaphor is made explicit in the second diagram, “Underskin” by Dutch designer Sam Lohman. Drawing heavily on the iconography of the London Underground, if not necessarily H.C. Beck’s rigid 45-degree angle topology, the diagram ambitiously attempts to represent eight separate body sytems. I do note that newer versions of this diagram have abandoned the use of the “Tube roundel” logo… I wonder if TfL had a say in that?

Finally, we have Occipital Design’s “Arterial Schematic” from 2012, which concentrates solely on one half of the cardiovascular system, the arterial system (Arteries carry blood that is pumped away from the heart, while veins return blood to the heart). “Zones” divide the schematic up into separate body regions. The designer, Luke Farmery, makes Beck’s influence on his diagram clear on his project page. For mine, this piece is actually an effective use of the transit map metaphor, which does get abused horribly a lot of the time. It’s designed as a simplified learning aid for medical students – just as Eduard Weber’s diagram was some 50-odd years previously – and in that respect, I think it works well.

Submission – EmbarkBOS iPhone App: Boston Rapid Transit Map 

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps

Submitted by Guy Delco, who says:

I’m in Boston regularly for business, and find myself on the T often.  Downloaded the EmbarkBOS app.  It has a particularly good rendering of the MBTA system. I particularly like the way they capture the several commuter rail lines out of South and North Stations in varying shades of purple. 

You’ve probably seen it, but if not, here’s an image screen-capped from my phone. 

Transit Maps says:

Actually, I hadn’t seen this map before (having no need of a Boston map app here in Portland, OR) , so thanks to Guy for sending it along!

Guy is right: this is a very solid representation of the MBTA “T” and commuter rail services in the one map. However, there’s one glaring error in the screenshot that Guy sent: the new Assembly station on the Orange Line (opened August 2014) is not shown. Either Guy needs to update his app to a newer version, or Embark needs to add it to their map!

A couple of minor things on the Framingham/Worcester commuter rail line: it’s not immediately obvious how the line passes through Back Bay station, as the abrupt change in direction is hidden behind the Orange Line. Also, the little jog in the line at Yawkey to separate the commuter station from the Green Line is a little awkward-looking.

The map does a pretty good job at naming all the Green Line stations, although it’s always a shame to not see the Chestnut Hill/Cleveland Circle/Reservoir station triplet in close proximity to each other. As it stands, Cleveland Circle looks like it’s quite near to Riverside, which is much, much further out in real life. However, it’s a diagram, not a map – so I can’t quibble too much about these things!

I do like the addition of airport codes to the map, which add some extra information to the map without being too visually overpowering.

Our rating: A solid combined rapid transit/commuter rail map with a couple of minor quirks. Three stars.