Submission – Historical Map: Melbourne Tramways of WWI

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Hi Cam, Adam from the Melbourne Tram Museum here. Would love to get your thoughts on this! This is my first map done from scratch.

We’ve recently launched our special exhibition named Tramway Anzacs, which tells the story of the 538 tramway employees who volunteered for military service in World War 1. As well as sharing their fascinating stories (including a guy who went from being a Cable Tram Gripman at Port Melbourne depot to fighting alongside Lawrence of Arabia!), we wanted to tell the social history of Melbourne, the impact on the war, and give an insight into the tramway systems at the time.

Melbourne had several different transport networks operating in that era – there was the cable tram system in the inner parts of the city, and the electric trams fanning out into the new suburbs (owned by a mix of city councils and private companies). The Victorian Railways also operated a reasonable (steam-hauled) suburban service. A small number of petrol and horse buses also operated in local areas.

I figured the best way to show what travel in the era was like would be through a historically accurate map designed with modern and familiar conventions, but also reflecting the design trends of the era.

While several books about the cable and electric tram networks have included published track maps, these were in turn generated from the old Osboldstone, Sands & McDougall, and Mullens maps of the era. But these only showed the tracks, not the specific routes that operated – certainly not with individual route lines. The routes were often described on the reverse of these maps, along with fare and timetable information.

Leaning heavily on the current Public Transport Victoria/Yarra Trams map symbology for the Melbourne Tram Network, and using a geographic map of the era as a base I plotted out each specific route, using this particular combination of geographically accurate with modern symbology (given at the time the diagrammatic style was not yet widely used).

However, finding out what the specific routes were and their numbers/identifiers was actually quite difficult; the books I used as reference were often not specific enough! I had particular difficulty with finding the routes of the Prahran and Malvern Tramways Trust in the south-eastern suburbs. In a cruel twist once I had completed the first substantive version of the map, I discovered a copy of the Osboldstone pocket rail and tram map (c. 1916) in our museum archives that listed each of the routes and the streets they travelled in. Luckily all of my long-hand research turned out to be correct…

Colours and Symbology

I selected colours for the Cable Tram route lines from the colours that the trams themselves were painted in; when the system was first built in the 1880s a large chunk of the population was illiterate, so they could not read signage. To remedy this, the Melbourne Tramway and Omnibus Company (MTOC) provided fixed destination information and painted the trams in distinctive colours for each route, also displaying a lamp of that colour at night (these colours were repeated on different city streets). At the time, the cable grip+trailer sets only operated on specific routes, and so did not require changeable destination signs.

Electric trams used a mix of movable destination blinds, route numbers/letters, and coloured lights dependent on the operator. A great example is the lines of the Hawthorn Tramways Trust (HTT) which operated from Princes Bridge along Swan St to Camberwell, Norwood (Burwood), and Wattle Park. For these route lines I used the coloured light combination that would be shown corresponding to the destination; I also used the same for the routes of the PMTT (solid colour route lines were routes that used two lamps of the same colour). Curiously the Melbourne, Brunswick, and Coburg Tramways Trust (MBCTT) used a Sydney-style system of coloured shapes with destination text; I used the colours of these for the route lines along Lygon Street.

I believe this is the first time that all of the actual tram routes that operated in WW1-era Melbourne have been plotted together on the same diagram.

Fascinating Observations

  • The PMTT services using Glenferrie Road Malvern as a key corridor, and how far the network had expanded into the eastern and south-eastern Suburbs
  • St Kilda being a very popular destination and the utility of the services to Esplanade from the suburbs. Apparently these were very popular on Sundays.
  • Through-routing of cable services through the city
  • Use of Lonsdale Street in both directions for Cable services
  • The number and pattern of routes operated by the Hawthorn Tramways Trust. This was the only electric network to run into the CBD from its inception
  • The location of the Cable/Electric tram system interchange points and the routes that served these

What I would do differently in the next version

  • Cable routes shown as two parallel lines of the same colour with a small gap between, rather than a solid line – to differentiate them from the electric lines, also to serve as an allegory for the cable slot distinct to these tracks;
  • In the central city area, showing the cable route lines intersecting with some going “over” or “under” those they intersect; determined by the arrangement of the physical cables at those intersections. For example, at Collins and Swanston Street the moving cables for the Collins Street trams went over the top of the cables in Swanston Street, because of the incline immediately east of the intersection in Collins Street. The gripmen driving the cable tram services in Swanston Street would have to “throw” the cable out of the jaws of the grip and coast through these intersections, picking up the cable on the other side of the intersection. 
  • The legend

Printed copies of this map in A2 size are currently available through our gift shop, and will shortly be available through our new online store. We’re a non-profit organisation run entirely by volunteers – all proceeds come back to furthering our preservation and curation of Melbourne’s fascinating tramway history.

Cheers! Adam (@1500vDC / @TramMuseum)


Transit Maps says:

Phew! There’s not a lot more to say after Adam’s extensive rundown of this fantastic project. I love a well-researched, nicely drawn map, and this one ticks all those boxes for me. There’s enough visual cues taken from the official modern-day map for this map to look familiar to Melburnians, but it also has a life of its own. I love the deep brown colour at the top of the map with the operating companies’ logos reversed out of it, and there’s lots of interesting information at the bottom, too. Attractive and educational!

I agree with Adam’s “next version” suggestions: the stroked line for the cable car lines makes a lot of sense, both visually and metaphorically and it would be fun to see exactly how those cables crossed each other. As with the cable cars in San Francisco, those gripmen must have been incredibly strong and vigilant to ensure their grip jaws never entangled in a cable that crossed their route!

The legend could perhaps use some extra detail about the routes and operators, but not at the cost of reducing the informational text next to it: it’s a fine balancing act. For the most part, the text on the map itself does a good job of explaining which company operates which route, so it’s not a big deal in my eyes.

Overall, I think this is a great project with immense historical interest, and it looks great, too!

Amanda Merzdan “DC Metro” EP Covers

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Popular Culture

xoverit:

I came across these EPs by Australian indie folk musician Amanda Merdzan and instantly recognized the Washington, DC Metro.

http://noisetrade.com/amandamerdzan/the-map-has-been-redrawn

http://www.last.fm/music/Amanda+Merdzan/The+Map+Has+Been+Redrawn

Well, almost. I’m not quite sure where the Yellow Line is heading off to at the top… maybe that’s the “redrawn” part of the map?

Submission – Future Map: Edmonton LRT Network by Dan Lazin

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Future Maps, Official Maps

Submitted by Dan, who says:

Hi! Just saw that you posted Edmonton’s long-term LRT network plan.

That’s the engineering consultants’ version; I designed a nicer map on commission for the mayor’s office — with significantly more detail, based on the individual line plans — which you can see here. The city’s transportation site still uses the consultants’ version, but their advocacy site uses my redesign. (For some reason, though, they decided to crop the full map on that site, which is why I posted the full PDF separately.)

Alternatively, if you want to see the more detailed version of the consultants’ map, it’s on page 4 of this PDF (with the simplistic version you already posted on page 1):

It’s odd, and certainly confusing, that the city offers so many versions of the same thing, but my understanding is that the nice version is used primarily for in-person advocacy between the mayor and other orders of government. That strategy has been pretty effective; Mayor Iveson was elected in Oct 2013, and by March 2014, the federal government and the province both committed to fund the SE line.

(I meant to send the new map to you when we unveiled it last year, but there’s one small design change I’ve been experimenting with and haven’t had time to finish. Oh well!)


Transit Maps says:

Well, Dan’s map is certainly an improvement over the map I featured yesterday! It’s bright, colourful and easy to understand – great for the advocacy role it performs. 

I personally find the convoluted path the North Saskatchewan River takes across the map a bit visually distracting (even though it is a pretty good representation of the river’s actual meandering path) and would have simplified or rounded/smoothed it out a bit, just to make it a bit softer. 

The placement of the Jasper Place and Meadowlark stations within their respective 90-degree angle changes is a little unattractive – they could just be nudged up/down a tiny amount to sit in the vertical sections of their routes, I think.

Overall, however, I think this is an attractive and successful future network map: clean and clear, but not overly detailed. Nice work, Dan!

Submission – Future Map: Long-term LRT Network Plan, Edmonton, Canada

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Submitted by everythings-shiny-captain, who says:

I live in Calgary, so I’m familiar with Calgary Transit’s “Route Ahead” plan to expand light rail and bus rapid transit services. Out of curiosity I searched for Edmonton Transit’s plan and found this terrible map of their light rail development plan. What is going on?!

Transit Maps says:

At first I thought this was just yet another poorly drawn, generic “future corridors” map and was wondering what the fuss was about… and then I looked at the PDF on my iPhone (second image above). 

Whoops! Suddenly, I could see all the working layers from the original Illustrator file as well. Even though those layers were turned off before the export to PDF, they are still visible when viewed on some mobile devices (the layer settings in the PDF aren’t being honoured by the PDF renderer on the device).

The lesson here: always clean up/flatten your artwork before output, and test how it looks on as many devices as you can!

Source: City of Edmonton website (link no longer active)

Historical Map: 1968 WMATA Metrorail Promotional Map

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps

Part of a promotional brochure discovered by Reddit user Globalwrath while cleaning his grandmother’s estate, here’s a fascinating look at the early pre-construction history of Metrorail.

Much of the actual current system is represented fairly well as the “Authorized Basic System” (thin black lines) and “Adopted Regional System” (thick black lines) with at-grade sections represented by pink lines instead. Station names are obviously tentative (Pooks Hill? Weapons Plant?), but the alignments are very familiar.

Of perhaps more interest are the thick dashed lines that represent future extensions. Even in 1968, a connection out to Dulles Airport was envisaged… and is only now becoming a reality some 47 years later. Other extensions deep in to Maryland and Virginia (Germantown? Brandywine?) seem far less likely to ever eventuate.

Neon Subway Maps by Petr Koll

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Miscellany

Really nice work here. What I love most is that these aren’t just neon copies of the official maps (that’s London above, not really looking like Beck’s map at all) but are the artist’s own interpretation of each system. Click on the source attribution below to go see all the other systems on the designer’s website – he’s made installations based on many cities, including Paris, New York, Tokyo and others.

Side note: shame on the so-called design websites that literally took every image of this project from Petr’s website and posted it to their own, giving readers little incentive to explore the original source of this remarkable work.

Source: Petr Koll’s portfolio website

Annotated BART Map Sketch by Sophie Helf, 2011

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Miscellany

Judgmental? Maybe just a little bit, but I do like “One time I fell asleep and ended up here” for Millbrae.

Also, is “Ew, No” the modern equivalent of “Here Be Dragons”?

Source: Sophie Helf/Flickr

Official Map: Metrovalencia, Valencia, Spain, 2015

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

The opening of Metrovalencia’s new Line 9 in March 2015 led to both a restructuring of the previous network (renumbering and rerouting of some lines) and this new system map. 

This version differs from previous ones in that it differentiates between “metro” and “tram” services – using a solid line with white station dots for the former, and an two-toned line with coloured station dots for the latter. I’m not entirely sure the differentiation needs to be made at all – the entire system is a bit of a hybrid anyway, having the features of a true metro, commuter rail and street-running tram in different areas – but it’s carried off pretty well overall. The use of more subdued colours for the tram lines certainly helps to visually separate them from the more brightly-hued Metro lines.

While the loop at the eastern (beach) end of Line 4 is shown well, I’m less convinced by the loop for Line 6. I think that the northbound track (the leftmost one) should just drop down to rejoin the bi-directional part of the line just above the Mediterrani station, perhaps with a little curve to the south-east, just to reinforce the directional flow of the traffic.

The interchange stations stand out well from normal ones, but use an exotic variety of shapes: rectangles, squares, a triangle and an overly complex “L” shape for the main interchange at Angel Guimera. The triangle at Empalme could definitely have been solved using three dots in a straight line (yellow at top, then blue, then magenta), and I think a similar approach could have been taken with Angel Guimera – a vertical pill with yellow at the top, then magenta, brown, red and green, sitting just to the left of the crossover of the tracks.

Technically, the map is drawn quite well, except for some sloppy station dot placement west of Faitanar on the main Lines 3/5/9 alignment. I’d prefer to see a curve coming out the right hand side of Rosas station for the right-angle that Line 9 takes northwards, as I always think direction changes within a station look a little awkward.

The typeface used shares a lot of similarities with Klavika, but isn’t. Anyone able to ID it more positively?

Our rating: A solid evolution on the previous map, information-rich and nice and easy to read. A few technical errors and a PDF download that renders type terribly on-screen drops this down half a star. Three-and-a-half stars.

Source: Metrovalencia downloads page. Note that they also offer two alternative maps on their site: a fully-geographic representation, and an “urban” map, which shows the city accurately, but switches to a diagrammatic representation for the farther-flung parts of the system. Covering all their bases, map-wise!

Subway Maps in Mario Kart 8 “Super Bell Subway” Course

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Popular Culture

Sent my way by quite a few people now! Taken from a new DLC map set inside a subway station and the surrounding tracks, we have quite the array of maps! Here we have a map for the whole system, a strip map for the Orange Line, and even a locality map!

The main subway map itself is pretty non-descript and generic – not a lot to say about this. The strip map, however, is pretty neat: it indicates direction of travel and the final destination nicely, as well as the name of the next station. Numbers here refer to the station number along each line, rather than representing the line itself as a whole. Hence, “our” station of Golden Bell is O4/B6/R4, being the fourth station along the Orange Line, the sixth on the Blue, and the fourth again on the Red. We can see that Ribbon Road station (O5) also serves as B7, and so on. This kind of numbering of stations along route lines occurs quite often in Asian transit systems, so it’s no surprise to see it in a game produced in Japan.

The locality map is very handsome, showing an interesting radial street pattern with lots of parkland and the lovely Toad Harbor. However, the layout of the Metro lines shown leaving the station doesn’t match the subway map at all. Blue and Orange diverge immediately after leaving the station in both directions, instead of staying concurrent in the direction of Ribbon Road and Baby Park stations.

Source: this imgur album

Photo: GO Transit Schedule/Map Display

Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps

Combination system map/schedule display for Ontario’s GO Transit commuter rail system. Things start to get a bit silly when the map morphs into even thicker lines that lead from the routes to the nearby colour-coded timetables. Overkill, methinks.

Source: Chris Drew/Twitter