Part of a promotional brochure discovered by Reddit user Globalwrath while cleaning his grandmother’s estate, here’s a fascinating look at the early pre-construction history of Metrorail.
Much of the actual current system is represented fairly well as the “Authorized Basic System” (thin black lines) and “Adopted Regional System” (thick black lines) with at-grade sections represented by pink lines instead. Station names are obviously tentative (Pooks Hill? Weapons Plant?), but the alignments are very familiar.
Of perhaps more interest are the thick dashed lines that represent future extensions. Even in 1968, a connection out to Dulles Airport was envisaged… and is only now becoming a reality some 47 years later. Other extensions deep in to Maryland and Virginia (Germantown? Brandywine?) seem far less likely to ever eventuate.
Really nice work here. What I love most is that these aren’t just neon copies of the official maps (that’s London above, not really looking like Beck’s map at all) but are the artist’s own interpretation of each system. Click on the source attribution below to go see all the other systems on the designer’s website – he’s made installations based on many cities, including Paris, New York, Tokyo and others.
Side note: shame on the so-called design websites that literally took every image of this project from Petr’s website and posted it to their own, giving readers little incentive to explore the original source of this remarkable work.
The opening of Metrovalencia’s new Line 9 in March 2015 led to both a restructuring of the previous network (renumbering and rerouting of some lines) and this new system map.
This version differs from previous ones in that it differentiates between “metro” and “tram” services – using a solid line with white station dots for the former, and an two-toned line with coloured station dots for the latter. I’m not entirely sure the differentiation needs to be made at all – the entire system is a bit of a hybrid anyway, having the features of a true metro, commuter rail and street-running tram in different areas – but it’s carried off pretty well overall. The use of more subdued colours for the tram lines certainly helps to visually separate them from the more brightly-hued Metro lines.
While the loop at the eastern (beach) end of Line 4 is shown well, I’m less convinced by the loop for Line 6. I think that the northbound track (the leftmost one) should just drop down to rejoin the bi-directional part of the line just above the Mediterrani station, perhaps with a little curve to the south-east, just to reinforce the directional flow of the traffic.
The interchange stations stand out well from normal ones, but use an exotic variety of shapes: rectangles, squares, a triangle and an overly complex “L” shape for the main interchange at Angel Guimera. The triangle at Empalme could definitely have been solved using three dots in a straight line (yellow at top, then blue, then magenta), and I think a similar approach could have been taken with Angel Guimera – a vertical pill with yellow at the top, then magenta, brown, red and green, sitting just to the left of the crossover of the tracks.
Technically, the map is drawn quite well, except for some sloppy station dot placement west of Faitanar on the main Lines 3/5/9 alignment. I’d prefer to see a curve coming out the right hand side of Rosas station for the right-angle that Line 9 takes northwards, as I always think direction changes within a station look a little awkward.
The typeface used shares a lot of similarities with Klavika, but isn’t. Anyone able to ID it more positively?
Our rating: A solid evolution on the previous map, information-rich and nice and easy to read. A few technical errors and a PDF download that renders type terribly on-screen drops this down half a star. Three-and-a-half stars.
Source:Metrovalencia downloads page. Note that they also offer two alternative maps on their site: a fully-geographic representation, and an “urban” map, which shows the city accurately, but switches to a diagrammatic representation for the farther-flung parts of the system. Covering all their bases, map-wise!
Sent my way by quite a few people now! Taken from a new DLC map set inside a subway station and the surrounding tracks, we have quite the array of maps! Here we have a map for the whole system, a strip map for the Orange Line, and even a locality map!
The main subway map itself is pretty non-descript and generic – not a lot to say about this. The strip map, however, is pretty neat: it indicates direction of travel and the final destination nicely, as well as the name of the next station. Numbers here refer to the station number along each line, rather than representing the line itself as a whole. Hence, “our” station of Golden Bell is O4/B6/R4, being the fourth station along the Orange Line, the sixth on the Blue, and the fourth again on the Red. We can see that Ribbon Road station (O5) also serves as B7, and so on. This kind of numbering of stations along route lines occurs quite often in Asian transit systems, so it’s no surprise to see it in a game produced in Japan.
The locality map is very handsome, showing an interesting radial street pattern with lots of parkland and the lovely Toad Harbor. However, the layout of the Metro lines shown leaving the station doesn’t match the subway map at all. Blue and Orange diverge immediately after leaving the station in both directions, instead of staying concurrent in the direction of Ribbon Road and Baby Park stations.
Combination system map/schedule display for Ontario’s GO Transit commuter rail system. Things start to get a bit silly when the map morphs into even thicker lines that lead from the routes to the nearby colour-coded timetables. Overkill, methinks.
I’ve attached the second edition of my “NM Transit Guide,” which I previously submitted one or two weeks back. The new version includes, along with some visual changes that I feel make it more aesthetically pleasing, a feature which as far as I can tell is a unique form of presenting information – I’ve never seen it on any other transit map. On the reverse side of the guide I have several tables of connections, showing where and when you can transfer from one route to another – and even accommodating trips involving multiple transfers! Planning a trip from, say, Taos to Jemez Springs, takes about fifteen minutes using prior knowledge and the available online schedules; with this guide I’ve managed to reduce that to one or two minutes. I’d love to know what you think of this method of presenting information, and of the guide in general. I feel this is a huge step up from my Park & Ride maps of last summer!
Transit Maps says:
From this and the drafts that Kara has previously submitted, I can see that a great deal of work and thought has gone into this, but I feel it can still be improved upon.
First thing: I think that the mid-grey background is hindering, not helping, this map. There’s a reason why most transit maps have a white or very light background: it helps to maximise contrast between elements. If you converted this map to greyscale in Photoshop (as I’ve done below), you’d find that the background is pretty close to 50% black, which means the most contrast it can ever have compared to another element is 50% – either all the way to black or all the way to white.
And as you can see, all the elements that aren’t pure black or white are compressed closer to the background’s mid-tone, resulting in low contrast throughout. Probably fine for people with good vision, but terrible for low lighting conditions or riders with poor eyesight. I personally also find the dark grey background a little oppressive and not at all “southwest desert” in tone. I like the colours in a map to evoke the place they represent, and the wonderful palettes available in a place like New Mexico should really be utilised to their fullest extent.
Next: hierachy. The Rail Runner commuter rail is represented by a thick yellow line, but with a white stroke through it that differentiates it from the Park and Ride Intercity Express Bus services, which are also thick and colour-coded by route. However, all the other bus services (which are also intercity and sometimes have frequencies that match or exceed the P&R buses) are relegated to thin, spindly lines that are only coloured to show which company they represent. As a result, line thickness doesn’t seem to indicate either mode or frequency, instead being a somewhat arbitrary divider of “important” vs. “non-important” routes. Frequency would seem to be a big issue for services in this part of the world, with some routes running as many as 13 times a day and one (the 360 between Taos and Tres Piedras) only running once a week on Wednesdays. Yet the map makes no attempt at all to show this. Having a bus that only runs on one particular day each week would seem to be a big deal. I’d be really interested to see this map reworked as a frequency map, much as the awesome new San Francisco Muni map is.
Clarity of information: I’d say that listing each route number next to its termini is imperative. At the moment, tracking down exactly where each route starts and ends is a little difficult, especially when they’re not listed in the legend to the right. Extra route numbers along the way to guide users through the more congested parts of the map are fine, but start and end points are extremely important! Pay attention where there could be potential confusion – I still don’t know which bus route(s) run between Eldorado and Santa Fe Place.
Overall, I’d like to see the shapes the “minor” bus routes take simplified a little more to match the lovely stylised, wide, sweeping curves that your “thick” routes take: they can seem a little cramped and fussy in a few places. Expanding the central/Santa Fe part of the map could help a bit here: there’s a lot going on in a very small space in this section of the map.
On the positive side, I’m really intrigued by your connections table and think it just needs a bit of spit and polish to really make it sing. I reckon you could just list the “Arriving” bus once on the left hand side if it connects with multiple other services on the right. Think of it as this bus connects with all of these buses. It would cut down on duplicated names and make things even quicker to find. Generally, text in tables should ranged left, rather than centred – it makes it easier for the eye to follow down a column if all the text starts in the same relative position. It also makes sorting and finding by word length easier. Time entries should be aligned on the colon, so that the hours and minutes columns line up properly. If you’re using OpenType fonts in InDesign, activate the “Tabular Lining” option for numerals in the Character palette, as this ensures that all numbers, regardless of character width, take up the same horizontal space, aligning perfectly in columns every time. Finally, I’d definitely see if you could do some testing of this table with some real commuters, just to see if it makes things as easy as you think it does. People react to information in very different ways!
Keep on refining and revising this with a clear objective in mind and this map will only get better!
It suddenly appeared to me that the Berlin S-Bahn system had the form of Da Vinci’s Man of Vitruvius: a circle (Ringbahn), two arms (Stadtbahn) and a head + legs (Nord-Südtunnel and the southern branches at Yorckstrasse), with Friedrichstrasse as the heart of the network. So I made a map. What do you think?
Transit Maps says:
Well, that’s certainly a creative and unusual way to interpret the Ringbahn! Of course, it’s a diagrammatic representation, so things can be tweaked to suit the designer’s vision – lining up Schöneberg with the Vitruvian Man’s left foot; raising the Stadtbahn’s horizontal axis up to mimic the arms, etc. The real Ringbahn is nowhere near so perfectly neat, taking a far more convoluted path through Berlin’s outer suburbs. According to Wikipedia, the distinctive shape formed by the Ringbahn earns it the the nickname “Hundekopf” (dog’s head)… which I can just about imagine if I squint long enough at the real map.
Still, full marks for creativity and the skill to turn that idea into something convincing!
Question: What’s your opinion of Pablo Impallari’s Cabin font? The first time I saw it it screamed “transit map” at me, and I’m curious to know what you think.
Answer: Seeing as the author’s own description of the typeface says this…
The Cabin Font is a humanist sans inspired by Edward Johnston’s and Eric Gill’s typefaces…
… I think that it would probably qualify as a fine wayfinding/transit map typeface just by pedigree alone. More Johnston Sans than Gill Sans, which is a good thing (in my opinion), the typeface seems nice and balanced, and differentiates well between “I”, “l”, and “1″, which is essential in a good wayfinding font. It’s not without its quirks, though: the flared “M” and square tittles (the dots above the lower case “i” and j”) won’t be for everyone. Still, it’s very definitely worth a try, especially if your map is trying to evoke a London Underground or 1930s feeling.
Question: Is there a reason that props departments often alter transit maps used in movies? Is it to get around copyright issues?
Answer: Absolutely! Almost every official transit map in the world is copyrighted and owned by the agency it represents. This means that permission – and often, a hefty licensing fee – is required to use the map for commercial purposes. So, rather than go through that, most TV shows/movies will quickly pull together their own version of the transit map they need, with varying results.
