Official Map: Sydney Olympic Park Major Event Buses

February 10, 2015
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Official Maps
Tags:


Following on from yesterday’s post, thanks to “adros47” who left a comment noting that Transport NSW does in fact have an official map of Olympic Park special event bus services. Unlike Jimmy’s semi-geographical approach, this map is completely and unapologetically diagrammatic, and it actually works pretty well for me. 

About the only thing that I’d really like to see (as on Jimmy’s map) is an indication of how long a bus trip might take from each of the termini. Google Maps tells me that Warriewood to Olympic Park via St. Ives takes 45 minutes “without traffic” – my experience with driving in Sydney tells me that this would easily take over an hour in real world conditions, and that’s without stopping to pick up passengers along the way.

The map also reveals some oddities in the numbering system for these buses. What happened to Route 3? Also, there doesn’t seem to be any real logic to the numbering: counting clockwise from Route 1, they number 1, 2, 4, 7, 6, 5 and 8. A little odd, but not really a problem.

There is one little design oddity that bugs me: the stops along the blue Routes 1A/1B after they join together near Olympic Park (from North Ryde Public School to Rhodes) are all coloured as if they interchange with another line. In reality, only the Rhodes stop is shared with the red Route 2, so the other four stops should just be a blue tick, not an interchange lozenge. One could also argue that an interchange symbol is somewhat redundant on this map, as everyone only ever travels between their point of origin and Olympic Park.

Our rating: A very competent diagram that conveys a lot of information in a compact space. Three stars.

Source: Transport NSW’s Sydney Olympic Park web page – link no longer active

Unofficial Map: Sydney Olympic Park Special Events Map by Jimmy Liu

February 9, 2015
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Unofficial Maps
Tags:

Having just returned from a family trip to my hometown of Sydney, here’s a very relevant map designed by Jimmy Liu. Of the map, Jimmy says:

I drawn a Sydney Olympic Park Major Event Transport Guide which includes special events buses and trains, as well as regular services operated around the SOP premises. There is no such guide exist in any authorities website and I think this should provide some real benefits for people who is interested to use public transport to the location. I have tried to minimize the size of the image but it soon prove to be not quite realistic. 🙁

Transit Maps says:

I absolutely love the ambitious goal of this map – to show all the transport options available for people trying to get to Sydney Olympic Park for special events (football and cricket matches, the Royal Easter Show, etc.) – but I’m not so crazy on the execution. As Jimmy himself says, the huge size of the map becomes an impediment to easy understanding of the content as type becomes too small, etc.

I feel that Jimmy could do worse than taking a look at the spider maps that Transport for London uses for bus services, which feature greatly enlarged central areas and diagrammatic outer regions. In the case of this map, I’d enlarge the Olympic Park complex greatly – clearly showing the relationship between all the venues, the two main bus terminals and the railway station – and simplify the outer region to a more diagrammatic form that could use much less space. Users of this map don’t need to see every twist and turn in the road along the way: all they really need to know is whether there’s a stop/station near their home that takes them to Olympic Park and how long the trip might take (the special buses from the Northern Beaches seem like they’d take forever to me!). An idea of frequency of service might be nice as well. Like the London maps, locality/suburb names in larger type could help users orient themselves on the map quickly. I do like the way that Jimmy has added the street address of all the stops as a subtitle beneath each stop’s name: this is very useful information!

I query the need to show most of the regular Sydney Bus routes: none of them seem like a very efficient way to get to the venue compared to the special services, as they have to stop far more often. Case in point: the 401 bus leaves from Lidcombe station and winds slowly through the back streets to reach the Olympic precinct, while frequent shuttle trains that also leave from Lidcombe go directly to the Olympic Park train station in a matter of minutes. The 526 bus, which connects the Park with the nearby ferry wharf, is an exception to this observation.

As a whole, depiction of the ferry service could be better. I think that it should show all the wharves between Olympic Park and the city (as many, many people could come up the river), and the map also needs to depict which side of the river each wharf is actually on. The marker for the Meadowbank wharf just sits in the middle of the river, for example, which isn’t that useful.

Finally, the map is littered with misspelled names – “Iran Cove” instead of “Iron Cove”, “Rozella” instead of “Rozelle”, “Delvin St” instead of “Devlin St”, and so on. Proof reading is important, people!

In short, the concept behind the map is great, but I feel it needs to be reworked and tightened up to get the best out of the idea.

Historical Map: Go Transit Timetable Map, June 26, 1974

January 25, 2015
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps
Tags:

Pretty bare bones and basic, as timetable maps often are, reflecting the extent of service, not the actual details. Only three rail lines compared to today’s six. For some reason, Thornlea is set in a much more condensed version of the typeface than every other label, even though it looks like it would fit easily. The agency still uses the groovy 70s “GO” part of the logo, but has wisely dropped the similarly-styled “TRANSIT”.  

Source: mpar21/Flickr

On Digitally Restoring Vintage Maps

January 23, 2015
comments 3
Filed Under:
Historical Maps, Prints Available, Tutorials
Tags:

Restoring the vintage transit maps that I’m now selling in my store is a laborious, time-intensive task, but I think that it’s definitely worth it in the end. The major task is getting rid of blemishes: age spots, ink smears, tears, creases, dirt, dust, and even hair or other fibres that are between the print and the scanning surface.

Obviously, Photoshop’s Clone Stamp, Spot Healing and Patch tools are the main weapons of choice here, but they need to be used intelligently and appropriately. I find that harder brush edges actually work better than soft edges, which tend to make an unpleasant 50/50 border where the original background fades into and merges with the new texture above. The Patch tool works well in discoloured open areas, but is lousy when the patch abuts an area of contrasting colour. The Spot Healing tool is great for removing dust spots with one click, but isn’t so good in areas with a lot of texture. So I definitely find myself flicking between  the three tools a lot as I work.

To make sure that I clean the whole map properly, I use a grid in Photoshop to divide the map up into even squares (a 2-inch grid works nicely for me), and then work through each and every square one after the other, like I was on an archaeological dig. I think it’s the best way to ensure consistency, otherwise I’d just flick through the map at random to fix the “big” problems, missing some of the more detailed work.

Once this is done — and depending on the map, it can take quite a while! — the rest is pretty simple. Some colour balance/white point adjustment to counter the yellowing of the paper while still retaining the “vintage” feel to the map, a general brightening of the image to get a better print, and some moderate high pass sharpening to finish off. The results speak for themselves, as seen in these before and after images of two of the completed maps (use the scrubber to compare).

The 1880 Washington DC Streetcars map is the oldest in the collection, and had a lot of problems relating to its age. I definitely spent a long time cleaning all the dust, ink and scuffs off this map!

This 1902 map of Chicago was in pretty fair condition apart from the fact that it was in two separate pieces. I carefully realigned the two pieces, then painstakingly clone stamped away the remaining crease and fold marks. Definitely worth it!

This gorgeous 1895 map of the Long Island Rail Road was, to put it bluntly, absolutely filthy. Huge streaks of dirt and discolouration covered much of the map and required dedication and patience to remove. Additionally, the original map was in two separate pieces which needed to be rejoined.

A lot of clean up for dust, age spots, fold lines and errant ink was required for the full restoration of this awesome 1931 map of Berlin and its railways, as seen in this before-and-after view of a section of the map just south of Spandau.

This wonderful pictorial map of railways in Germany had a lot of yellowing from age that required extensive colour correction, as well as the usual spot and crease/tear removal.

Historical Map: Surface Car Lines of Manhattan Island, August 13, 1915

January 16, 2015
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps
Tags:

Via the now inactive nyplmaps Tumblr:

Map showing surface car lines of Manhattan Island, August 13, 1915.

This 61 x 185 cm color map with an approximate scale of 1:12,500 shows the streetcar lines operated by NY Railways, the Third Avenue System and the Second Avenue Railroad Co. that once roamed the Isle of Manhattan. 

I’ll reblog just about anything transit-related from the New York Public Library’s map collection, but this is even more special than usual. What a beautiful map!

Historical Maps: Rail Transit in North America, 1984 by Dennis McClendon

January 16, 2015
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Historical Maps
Tags:

I thought I was all done with “to scale” maps of North American rail systems, but then Dennis McClendon (see previous posts from him) sent in this beautiful series of maps that he produced for Planning magazine back in 1984. Dennis himself says:

Given this week’s Tumblr theme, I thought you might be interested in these maps that I did in 1984, when I worked for Planning magazine. The “new wave” of modern light rail systems was just getting started. My initial idea was to do them all at the same scale, but integrating them with the text into a two-page magazine layout eventually required a compromise of doing them at two distinctive scales.

No GIS or even Illustrator in those days: I created these using Rubylith and Chartpak flexible line tape.

Of note is the large number of systems that were either brand new or still under construction: Portland’s “Banfield” line – now the main section of line between downtown and Gateway – being especially noticeable to me. Also – massive extensions under construction for the Washington DC Metro, and the parlous state of streetcars in New Orleans, with service on the historical St. Charles line only.

And just to throw further fuel onto the fire regarding the categorization of certain systems as either light rail or streetcar, which many commenters on Matt Johnson’s map brought up. In 1984 at least: Pittsburgh and Boston’s Green Line were classified as “light rail” while Philadelphia and the San Francisco Muni were seen as “streetcar”. Make of that what you will.

Source: Dennis McClendon via email.

Melbourne Trams and Toronto Streetcars to the same scale as US Streetcar Systems

January 14, 2015
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Visualizations
Tags:

My final post on this subject (for now). I absolutely love these two separate graphics that take a previous version of Matt Johnson’s graphic (which only compared streetcar systems in the US) and add either Melbourne’s comprehensive tram network or Toronto’s streetcar network at the same scale.

To be honest, I almost didn’t believe the Melbourne one when I first saw it – surely the creator had muddled up miles and kilometres! – and had to double check to make sure. It’s accurate.

Of course, Melbourne and Toronto are two of the few cities in the world where tram/streetcar operation have been continuous since their initial date of operation – electric streetcars began running in Toronto in 1892, while the first electric trams appeared in Melbourne in 1906. Looking at the US map, it can be seen that the historical streetcar networks of Philadelphia and New Orleans (a remnant of a much larger system) are the closest in scope and size to these two powerhouses; while the new, modern streetcars are much smaller, acting as downtown or inner city circulators, rather than a comprehensive city-wide transit system.

Sources: Melbourne – Crikey.com, Toronto: Adam Wenneman/Twitter

Infographic: Rail Rapid Transit of the United States and Canada to Scale by Peter Dovak

January 14, 2015
Leave a comment
Filed Under:
Visualizations
Tags:

A follow-up to yesterday’s post: several people pointed me to this graphic by Peter Dovak that extends the concept to include all rail-based rapid transit in the USA and Canada, including people movers and monorails (but not commuter rail).

transitoriented:

A compilation of rail rapid transit systems drawn (but not arranged) to scale.  An attempt at an homage to this classic map by Bill Rankin, updated for 2015.

View a larger resolution version here.